Matthew Miller
Matthew Miller
> I still don't understand why the hybrid-ness is something that we want to reveal to the developer or what they would actually learn from that check. Putting my earlier...
From WG F2F: FIDO raised no major issues, but we are open to the possibility of them sending comments in the future. IETF sent request for comments to the mailing...
From WG FD2F: PR #2280 will address concerns raised during i18n review. When that PR is merged this can be closed.
From WG F2F: Review is in-progress
From WG F2F: Waiting for clarification on the necessity of explainers for everything new in L3
I'm inclined to break this PR up to try and get some of the less contentious new error codes into L3 before the upcoming deadline (which those are, I'll try...
I've taken `HybridPrerequisitesError` and `UserHybridCancellationError` out of the running for now for sake of pursuing incremental improvement in WebAuthn's error messages instead.
This work is on the back burner for now while we continue to work on getting L3 through the process to get it to Recommendation so that it officially supplants...
> I think it would be OK to load a sign-in page behind the modal that comes up when a user clicks “Sign In”. I think in some testing that...
> It doesn’t! Because you’ll still get Hybrid’d. The goal is to only show credentials that are local, and then have a “Passkey” button on the page that will make...