asynctest icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
asynctest copied to clipboard

Enhance the standard unittest package with features for testing asyncio libraries

Results 52 asynctest issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added

We were exploring aio_pika and we had this test: ``` class OurTest(TestCase): async def test_one(self): with asynctest.mock.patch('aio_pika.robust_connect') as mcr: await AdapterClass.create(**options) #options is a dict declared prior to test class...

It would be very convenient if we could use the code for manually controlling event loop time within a plain test function as well (e.g. via some 'TimeSkipper' class that's...

Hi, Sorry if this is documented somewhere, but is there a way to force either Mock, MagicMock or CoroutineMock to always return CoroutineMock for method calls? I understand that this...

The name CoroutineMock is confusing (see #100, #101, etc) as it's the mock of a coroutine function, not a coroutine itself. CoroutineMock should be renamed to CoroutineFunctionMock. CoroutineMock will be...

Currently, the behavior when calling a CoroutineMock with a coroutine as side_effect is undefined. It raises an exception with Python 3.6 and seems to run the coroutine with Python 3.5...

enhancement

Asynchronous generators are defined by [PEP 525](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0525/) and supported since Python 3.6 Unfortunately the syntax change (yielding from a coroutine) is not backward compatible, previous versions of Python will raise...

While testing with uvloop, the @fail_on decorator seems to rely on the internals of the default asyncio loop: ```python import asyncio import asynctest import uvloop # make calls to asyncio.get_event_loop()...

Now that CoroutineMock relies on the loop for some features, we should let the user specify which loop shall be used. CoroutineMock(loop=None) # default, in this case, get_event_loop() is called...

Let's use py.test and codecoverage (with support for branching). It can be configured like this: https://github.com/Kentzo/async_app/blob/master/setup.py#L15-L27 https://github.com/Kentzo/async_app/blob/master/setup.py#L50 https://github.com/Kentzo/async_app/blob/master/setup.cfg#L25-L27

Docs say that classes extending asynctest.TestCase can have either a sync or async. Because the default implementation is sync, it is impossible to write mixins that implement setUp and call...

help wanted
question