CleanedBitCrack Fix 'Consider using rand_r(...) instead of rand(...) for improved thread safety.' issue in secp256k1lib\secp256k1.cpp

Fix 'Consider using rand_r(...) instead of rand(...) for improved thread safety.' issue in secp256k1lib\secp256k1.cpp

Open codefactor-io[bot] opened this issue 6 years ago • 0 comments

CodeFactor found an issue: Consider using rand_r(...) instead of rand(...) for improved thread safety.

It's currently on: secp256k1lib\secp256k1.cpp:686 Commit 154e1de4f0dddb45d4f4f482c11be5ff46437f97

Aug 20 '19 05:08 codefactor-io[bot]