Mark

I don't feel like this feature is necessary. If it were to be added, the simplest way would be to have the same behaviour as the normal rules command, but...

I don't think discoverability is too important because the primary way to use the command is with rule numbers, which are already discoverable. The keyword support is there for those...

> Then I don't quite get the whole point of adding the feature in the first place if the rules are always discoverable and displayed in !help rules. Numbers are...

> I personally don't know if it's possible to dynamically generate doc strings, but a quick search will help me find out. I am not certain, but you can look...

> I think that changing that dynamically is going to be a PITA concerning how simple this should be. The doc dunder attribute is not writable, which throws an AttributeError...

> My bad, what I meant is, we have another callback that fetches & composes the rules, and then the help argument in the command decorator will take that callback....

@MrHemlock We don't know which words are disallowed. Thus, we cannot prevent new invalid names from being added.

> Just feels like more maintenance to have to have to add and potentially remove in future. Being concerned about complexity is valid. With that in mind, we could do...

This is a good suggestion as it will really improve the usability of the command for the masses. A few points which are open to discussion: 1. In cases where...

I was thinking tkinter could be used for the GUI, though in hindsight it is technically an optional component when installing Python. Regardless, it may be a good choice since...