Marco Rossignoli
Marco Rossignoli
@martincostello `ResilienceHandler.cs` is your code?
cc: @Evangelink @drognanar @pavelhorak
> For now i added --ignore-exit-code 8 as a workaround. Is there a better way? This is correct. I think we there's a bug in the documentation. Run 0 tests...
my 2c * if the code returns to the platform control I prefer a return for perf reason...anyway we're exiting and we cannot avoid any race conditions on that cancellation(throw...
I don't think they work together. We need also to take into consideration that extension at that level(orchestrators) could not work always correctly or "make core feature more coarse" because...
> I think this should be handled as part of the config file (see https://github.com/microsoft/testfx/issues/3562 and https://github.com/microsoft/testfx/issues/3499). I am not sure there is really a need for a filter file....
> Is this not what I suggested in https://github.com/microsoft/testfx/issues/3499 ? This feature is slightly different. It used when the command line for some reason is really log and cannot fit...
This is a key feature to unblock the --filterByIds "long list of ids" that is used in some tooling to partition or select specific tests.
@Youssef1313 @nohwnd can we give it a push? I would need it for a CI scenario.
You can try to set the `CaptureTraceOutput` to false with a runsetting https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/test/configure-unit-tests-by-using-a-dot-runsettings-file?view=vs-2022#mstest-element