Marco Edward Gorelli

Right, let's try to move this forwards - I think this could be a nice addition to this page https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/blob/0dadc71dd4653e5b858d7b4153df1d7aded4ba46/doc/source/development/maintaining.rst Doesn't need to be in-depth, I think it just needs:...

Hi - please post a reproducible example, see https://matthewrocklin.com/blog/work/2018/02/28/minimal-bug-reports for how

closing, will reopen if you address the above

> I think it was introduced with this PR https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/pull/47018. [Can confirm](https://www.kaggle.com/code/marcogorelli/pandas-regression-48678?scriptVersionId=106211733) (though haven't looked any more closely than that yet), thanks for the report ``` 0277a9c49f5efb1edcb0ebdba48123e2fda2a590 is the first...

Related to https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/28299

likewise, with `errors='ignore'`

Thanks for weighing in > The second problem and very coupled to the optimized implementation is that there is no way to tell pandas to just use the first inferred...

superseded by https://pandas.pydata.org/pdeps/0004-consistent-to-datetime-parsing.html

~Thanks for the report From git bisect, looks like this was fixed in #46828~ this doesn't look right, will take another look later Looks like it was #47421 git bisect:...

Looks like this is due to using `1_000_000_000` instead of `1e9` There is https://github.com/jbrockmendel/pandas/blob/2f6116f259b88f9a6684fdf0ffe0e45078439602/pandas/core/arrays/timedeltas.py#L821-L823 which tests this, but still, probably better to have a proper test rather than relying on...