MarcDahlem
MarcDahlem
I struggeled with the same problems. I have two suggestions: 1) Dont work with ask and bid prices in your bot/strategy (hard, I know...) 2) I stored exactly one ticker...
Yes I can compare them with the ProfitLossPercentageCriterion, thanks. But as I have multiple trading records that belong to the same strategy (just run on different series), I would like...
not really. Also with a price of 1, apple would spent 100$ and Google would spent 1000$ when buying. If you just just want to spent 1$ you can get...
I posted an issue here in order to discuss, if such an optimization is wanted for the project. @team172011 what is your opinion about it? Should I open a PR...
Here is a fix and a complete ichimoku strategy: https://github.com/MarcDahlem/ta4j/blob/test/test-my-strategies/ta4j-examples/src/test/java/ta4jexamples/strategies/IntelligentTa4jOhlcBenchmarks.java#L442 As trade-dependent indicators https://github.com/ta4j/ta4j/pull/757 , before rules https://github.com/ta4j/ta4j/pull/773 and positive delay indicators https://github.com/ta4j/ta4j/pull/772 are not accepted to be merged here,...
References to already existing issues/solutions: * https://github.com/ta4j/ta4j/pull/495 * https://github.com/ta4j/ta4j/issues/448 * https://github.com/ta4j/ta4j/pull/452 * https://github.com/ta4j/ta4j/issues/374 * https://github.com/ta4j/ta4j/issues/614
> > > @MarcDahlem I am happy to see that there is a possible fix. I remember that there were discussions about this indicator years ago.. Yes I saw that...
I added the corrected ichimoku indicators without the need of the other rules. I just created another, simpler strategy as example
I totally agree with you, that this would be a nice and usefull feature, especially for better backtesting. A lot of people trade with strategies like "Market moved down -->...
Normally I would say we use a TreeMap for the cache and remove the map.firstEntry as soon as the cache is overfull. The benefit of the TreeMap is the automatic...