Martin Sivák
Martin Sivák
/remove-lifecycle rotten /retest
This is a bit too detailed I think, also it will cause merge conflicts with https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/71797
/lgtm from me
This is weird though, the container is configured properly (max), but the pod level is not. I wonder who writes the wrong (1000) value there.
Is this fixed by https://github.com/containers/crun/pull/1794 ?
Not only. It is missing from all families except F3.
@giuseppe Nope. The main motivation here is to make sure that all processes created via kubectl/oc exec (or exec probes) never interfere with cpus dedicated to latency sensitive workloads. This...
Andreas proposes irq-load-balancing.crio.io: "{: , ...}" But it might be better to implement it using something like this I think housekeeping-cpus.crio.io/[container-name]: 0,1 irq-load-balancing.crio.io: housekeeping cri-o would have to automatically determine...
I need to find time to review the current state of the patch, but in general: > I'm not sure about the usecase of housekeeping-full-pcpus-only. In what case do users...