manim License situation of library should be mentioned on landing page of documentation

License situation of library should be mentioned on landing page of documentation

Open behackl opened this issue 1 year ago • 3 comments

Title, basically.

I imagine one well-worded paragraph mentioning

that the library (both the original as well as the community edition) are MIT licensed,
that the code for Grant's videos (3b1b/videos) is open-source but copyrighted (in particular: Pi creatures are protected),
that videos created with Manim are allowed (and actually even supposed) to be shared online; no attribution of Manim is required (just much appreciated)

would do the job. Help coming up with a suitable wording is very welcome!

Jul 01 '24 09:07 behackl

Hey can this issue be assigned to me?

Oct 14 '24 23:10 riyasunil

@riyasunil you are welcome to work on this, just send a PR; we don't really use issue assignments here. Let us know if you run into any problems!

Oct 15 '24 07:10 behackl

alright thankyou ! 😊

Oct 15 '24 23:10 riyasunil

Looks like this can be closed now, right?

Oct 29 '25 16:10 Wertzui123