Sebastian Große

@marcelklehr @nullivex As nothing has happened since January, I am preparing a new release. You can check out https://github.com/Mairu/nodist if you want. I am OK if @nullivex creates the release...

Hi, I guess you mean the swagger file is requested from `api.domain.com/docs` but the page is served from `api.domain.com/v2/docs`? I understood that you have internally have set your feathers app...

Alternatively you can use your own function instead of using `uiIndex: true`. As you can see the default implementation for `uiIndex` is -> https://github.com/feathersjs-ecosystem/feathers-swagger/blob/6dff498d35d0e8d1c2dc7187efa78fa94ecfbc7c/lib/index.js#L46-L53 So you can also simply "rewrite"...

Well, the `indexFile` option of `feathers-swagger.swaggerUI` could be used to define a custom HTML file. In addition now with SwaggerUI >= 4.9, there is an initializer script, which you can...

Currently, the swagger-ui-dist npm package is a dependency, this change is a bit contradictive to that because you would then use a different version of swagger ui than you have...

The removal of the swagger-ui-dist package is now implemented and the section containing the HTML file was removed from the readme. Therefore that PR is obsolete. https://github.com/feathersjs-ecosystem/feathers-swagger/commit/104fdb61af86d04c71b98bea9f116ab6bf33a7b9#diff-b335630551682c19a781afebcf4d07bf978fb1f8ac04c6bf87428ed5106870f5

Do you perhaps have multiple usages of create_response also in another services? These names have to be unique in the whole specification.

Could you post the generated swagger specification json? (You can use the docsJsonPath option, if you have not enabled it yet) (You can also test it yourself in https://editor.swagger.io/ what...

Hi, I added a nested path example to my test repository. https://github.com/Mairu/feathersjs-swagger-tests/blob/feathers-v4/src/services/users/posts/posts.service.js I did not test it too much, but the creation and reading of posts of a user were...

Hi, I also thought about adding support for pagination out of the box for the next version. But it would be a breaking change if not hidden behind an option....