Any comparison against Librosa available ?

[stonelazy]

Am trying to evaluate Essentia for standard and streaming case of FFT. To port from librosa to Essentia, i need to determine the right set of parameter input values to be passed in Essentia so that i get the same output i used to get in Librosa. I've been attempting to do this, but the output values are differing. Probably am making some mistake since the naming convention is slightly different in both of these (Librosa and Essentia) libraries.
I just wanted to check with the community here if there is any notebook/script readily available that attempts to reproduce Librosa's output ? Or any other library's output ?

[stonelazy]

@dbogdanov Am sorry to be tagging you here. Could you pls take a look at this ?

[dbogdanov]

Hi! Which feature from Librosa were you trying to approximate? (e.g., mel-spectrograms?)

[stonelazy]

Thanks for responding, i look forward to use MFCC, InverseMelToSTFT and MelSpectrogram. Right now my implementation is in Torch and i look forward to migrated to Essentia for the CPP client support. Hence comparison against either torch or librosa is appreciated.

[Consulting4J]

any update about this ? c++ feature extraction is mandatory for deployment, especially for mobile device. Thanks