MSP-Greg

@joshuapinter Thanks for investigating this. I've been working on a test framework rewrite, part of its purpose is to make it easier to write tests for issues like this. Running...

Interesting. I ran CI using Ruby 2.5.7, 2.6.5, & 2.7.1, and results were similar to the above. Maybe I'll review the changelogs of the recent Ruby versions... Puma isn't used...

Speaking of logs, adding `log_requests` (or `quiet false`) to the config file will add request logging that shows 'app' time. Since this seems related to the Puma version used, one...

@joshuapinter Thanks for the reply. In the mp4's above, is the only 'client' hitting Puma the 'client app' you show? If so, that means the request count is low, so,...

Thanks for the clarification. We don't need an mp4 of it, but if you turn on logging, what times are shown in the Puma logging for the slow requests?

@joshuapinter Thanks, that helps. Most of the testing I've been doing is with GET requests, I'll try it with POST requests...

**Puma hat off** > ONE MAN SHOW Many advancements across many fields are the result of a single person or a small team. If the governance of Ruby is the...

First of all, two somewhat connected issues are being discussed here. First, why is JRuby's SSL support lagging, and second, why is Puma essentially bypassing Ruby OpenSSL. As to JRuby,...

I took a brief look at the stdlib, and there may be some things missing. Or, given the current functions called in the OpenSSL libraries from Puma, equivalents do not...

> its likely that some of the calls by the Puma extension are not needed Part of the reason I said 'brief look'. Some things could have been added for...