Michael Peters

Results 20 comments of Michael Peters

+1 interest in FIPS compliance for Zeek.

The team discussed this issue yesterday and agrees that the feature would be valuable. We should check the work @awelzel has previously done on metadata in Broker events. Some other...

@vpax mentioned today that he's specifically looking to estimate the message load incurred by new packages under development. The problem with doing this at the Zeek level is that some...

This one is on our agenda for Zeek 8.0 — but there's still room for disagreement about exactly what the implementation looks like, how the metrics are formatted, etc. Let's...

Just to capture some live conversation with the dev team: we want to dig into this issue further and decide on the best outcome. Unfortunately, we won't be able to...

I'm not seeing this recently, @bbannier. Can you double-check me? This might have been resolved just because work continued on the feature.

After discussion with @ckreibich, just for administrative purposes, let's limit the scope of this issue to _just_ what what Benjamin described above — put the results from the existing tool...

@ckreibich mentioned observing that the supervisor has issues with large numbers of processes, so that may be related — this may be an underlying bug, not just a flaky test.

@awelzel and @ckreibich report that they're not seeing this anymore. We'll close the issue and can reopen it if it reoccurs.

@Mohan-Dhawan — Have you encountered this? Do you have any opinions on the matter?