Feat/GitHub actions docker publish
Description
This PR Adds Github Docker Registry CI Build thru GH Actions.
Motivation and Context
Having the images ready to pull will simplify deployment at scale without requiring orgs to fork/build the application.
Changes Overview
Adds GH Actions to build CI images for x86 and ARM64
Types of changes
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
Testing
- [ ] I have tested these changes locally
Checklist:
- [ ] My change requires documentation updates
- [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly
- [ ] My code builds clean without any errors or warnings
- [ ] All new and existing tests passed
Summary by CodeRabbit
- Chores
- Introduced automated workflows to build and publish backend and frontend Docker images for each push to the main branch.
@google-labs-jules[bot] is attempting to deploy a commit to the Rohan Verma's projects Team on Vercel.
A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.
Walkthrough
A new GitHub Actions workflow file, "Docker Publish," has been added. This workflow runs on pushes to the main branch and contains two jobs: one to build and push a backend Docker image and another for the frontend. Both jobs target multiple architectures and publish images to GitHub Packages.
Changes
| File(s) | Change Summary |
|---|---|
| .github/workflows/docker-publish.yml | Added workflow to build and push multi-architecture Docker images for backend and frontend apps. |
Sequence Diagram(s)
sequenceDiagram
participant GitHub as GitHub Actions
participant Repo as Repository
participant Docker as Docker Buildx
participant GHCR as GitHub Container Registry
GitHub->>Repo: On push to main, checkout code
GitHub->>Docker: Setup QEMU and Buildx
GitHub->>GHCR: Login using GitHub token
GitHub->>Docker: Build backend image (multi-arch)
Docker->>GHCR: Push backend image with labels
GitHub->>Docker: Build frontend image (multi-arch)
Docker->>GHCR: Push frontend image with labels
Poem
🐇
A workflow hops in, neat and new,
Building backend and frontend too.
With Docker magic, images fly—
To GitHub Packages, oh so spry!
Multi-arch dreams now realized,
In YAML fields, our code is prized.
Hoppity hooray for CI done right!
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
🪧 Tips
Chat
There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
- Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.Explain this complex logic.Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
- Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:@coderabbitai explain this code block.@coderabbitai modularize this function.
- PR comments: Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.
Support
Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
@coderabbitai pauseto pause the reviews on a PR.@coderabbitai resumeto resume the paused reviews.@coderabbitai reviewto trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.@coderabbitai full reviewto do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.@coderabbitai summaryto regenerate the summary of the PR.@coderabbitai generate docstringsto generate docstrings for this PR.@coderabbitai generate sequence diagramto generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.@coderabbitai resolveresolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.@coderabbitai configurationto show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.@coderabbitai helpto get help.
Other keywords and placeholders
- Add
@coderabbitai ignoreanywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add
@coderabbitai summaryto generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add
@coderabbitaianywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.
CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)
- You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a
.coderabbit.yamlfile to the root of your repository. - Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
- If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation:
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
Documentation and Community
- Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
- Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
- Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Rabbit is wrong, github.repositoryUrl is correct: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/accessing-contextual-information-about-workflow-runs#github-context
Looks good to me. Should add in addition to the sha tag (on a new line), a duplicate label with ":latest" as well.
@fblgit Thanks for this 👍 will test this and merge by EOD.
Should we tags images as semver ? more human readable
https://semver.org/
hmmm.. the frontend package is not being pushed 👎 need some fix, also semver alignment should be followed, to keep consistency. @anshul7665 can u give a quick hand on this bro? im not really on the GH Actions thing ..
hmmm.. the frontend package is not being pushed 👎 need some fix, also semver alignment should be followed, to keep consistency. @anshul7665 can u give a quick hand on this bro? im not really on the GH Actions thing ..
The Actions file in this PR failed to run for both frontend and backend: https://github.com/MODSetter/SurfSense/actions/workflows/docker-publish.yml
There is a separate action that seems to have successfully pushed the backend (is not configured to do the same for the frontend): https://github.com/MODSetter/SurfSense/actions/workflows/docker_build.yaml
Obviously, don't want both actions running to avoid duplicates, but probably should use the working backend one as a reference to make a frontend variant.
@fblgit @nwithan8
Just wanted to let you guys know that @anshul7665 will take care of this in few days 👍
@nwithan8 , I am planning to extend the existing WORKING github action add additional job for frontend piece . For now I have removed the auto trigger for the other failing action . we can remove it later.
Added PR - https://github.com/MODSetter/SurfSense/pull/133
@nwithan8 @fblgit @MODSetter feel free to add your comments