工业聚
Yes, I think so.
从 runtime 机制上，可以有函数的版本，但写法会复杂一点。 从 type 层面，一旦涉及递归，目前的 TS，函数版本的 type infer 不奏效，TS 要求明确标注返回值。 class 版本，TS 有特殊处理，class 定义时，既包含 impl 实现，又包含 type 声明，可以支持递归关联。 函数版本，如果要保持 immutable，也很难实现递归引用。 总的来说，函数式的方式实现 farrow-module 可能是一个全新的思路和考量。现阶段还没有很清晰的想法。
Thx feedback, I will check it later:) ```typescript // for now, use `as` for workaround return Response.json({ code: 0, data: details, } as JsonType) ```
@sinoon @uinz Maybe we can file an issue for Typescript to see whether is a bug or not:-)
> Would this allow to use a typed API client on a frontend project that's separate from the backend? Yes, that is the goal. It will provide at least three...
@uinz Good point! Thanks for sharing!
Yes, the expected value of the JsonType is generally the plain javascript object/value, not the class instance If it is a class instance, it is expected to have a toJSON...
It seems easy to implement something like subscription via WebSocket or Polling in user-land. For now, I don't know much about what we need to support internally. If you already...
Yeah, I got it. If we want to use farrow-api via WebSocket, we need to add the codegen support in farrow-api. It may cause some degree of refactoring. It's not...
> Can there be a Subprogramme first? Such as a new package like farrow-subscription It's good, for the experiment.