Lucas Roesler

@baremaximum you mention this > Using an HTTP framework means that users will have to modify files in the template most of the time, instead of just modifying the handler....

Couldn't this also be achieved by splitting the gateway from the operator so that it can be deployed as a Singleton? What do we gain by having the operator HA...

I like that idea even better :) it does not seem to be part of the operator CI yet, i will check out the faas repo

I think you are right about needing to add a prefix to the service name, but I think i would rather see tis as something that is configured in the...

@dschulten i was thinking that the gateway would simply mutate the name internally, adding the required prefix. The gateway should have a way to determine what it's "name" is, either...

The handling of the service name would need to be updated in each of the handlers, which are conveniently located in `handlers/`. We would need to update to add/remove the...

@alexellis what do you think? We could update the the swarm provider so that the service name in docker has a prefix/namespace per gateway. This prefix would be completely internal...

> Might be better to mirror faas-netes for the build and upload for consistency as that's what we have in place in PRs so far. I'd like to see all...

@alexellis you can see * the latest branch build here https://github.com/LucasRoesler/faas-swarm/actions/runs/368722554 * the latest tag build here https://github.com/LucasRoesler/faas-swarm/runs/1414020963?check_suite_focus=true * and the resulting docker image here https://github.com/users/LucasRoesler/packages/container/package/faas-swarm

Part of openfaas/faas#1585