Ashy
Ashy
> Can the GET protocol default to INDEX_GET if the property access is not found? That is easily the best solution in my honest opinion. I'd attempt to contribute and...
> I'm gonna have to think this over. It's not a style choice that I would choose, so if I include it I'd like to see the following changes done:...
I have added the requested changes along with making the naming more consistent (renaming the feature to dynamic fields from meta fields) Let me know what you think and if...
I have applied the requested changes, did take me a while due to how long I been coding today lol so sorry if I made any silly mistakes but all...
> Don't sweat it! And don't feel like you have to make requested changes immediately. I don't have any plans to change things in Rune for at least a week...
I'll add the requested changes when I get back later as I am busy today, thank you for the review
I been busy past few days but I added the requested changes and forgot to mention it lol, I also added a tiny idea for the clean up but admittedly...
My bad, I genuinely completely forgot to push my changes to tests. I am surprised I didn't notice sooner as I had them ready but I ran the tests myself...
I have updated the PR to the latest version of rune however I have questions before we decide to add this. mostly in regards to naming; what name for this...
I am fine with this. I must ask though: Do you basically think that instead of modes existing just simply have a flag and treat all `DYNAMIC_FIELD_GET`'s and `DYNAMIC_FIELD_SET`'s as...