lolMiner-releases icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
lolMiner-releases copied to clipboard

ZIL too many rejected shares with 1.68...1.72

Open djRicky opened this issue 1 year ago • 9 comments

Hi I'm using lolminer-1.68.SwitchHiveOS.tar.gz and I have 20-30% of invalid shares mining ZIL with a well probed low OC profile. I don't have this problem with 1.67 so I think maybe there is a bug in 1.68 I used this parameters with 6 nvidia 3090: NEXA,pool.woolypooly.com:3124,WALLET.%WORKER_NAME%,{--coff 255,210,210,210,210,210 --cclk 1560,1740,1740,1740,1740,1740 --mclk 5001 --pl 350,350,350,350,350,350} ZIL,ssl://etchash.auto.nicehash.com:443,WALLET,{--cclk 1100 --moff 1800 --coff 0 --pl 350 --ethstratum ETHV1}

djRicky avatar Mar 01 '23 12:03 djRicky

I fully confirm., I also have a lot of red zil shares in hivos and in windows.

I also noticed a very large number of connections on port 5000. Apparently this is for switching to zil. I closed port 5000, but it broke the switch to zil. I would like the miner not to create 10 thousand states.

DervilRus avatar Mar 01 '23 18:03 DervilRus

Yes the 5000 is to check the windows hehe... if you closed no Windows ZIL to check :-) it is connecting to a ZIL Node

jgonzis avatar Mar 03 '23 10:03 jgonzis

Is it possible to reduce the number of states? other miners (I will not name them here) do not create such a huge network flow, although they also switch to zil in time. I'm not very good at this, but this seems wrong to me

VPN tcp 192.168.15.7:25707 (192.168.1.5:49292) -> 99.83.212.14:5000 FIN_WAIT_2:ESTABLISHED 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B MINING tcp 192.168.1.5:49294 -> 99.83.212.14:5000 ESTABLISHED:FIN_WAIT_2 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B VPN tcp 192.168.15.7:44417 (192.168.1.5:49294) -> 99.83.212.14:5000 FIN_WAIT_2:ESTABLISHED 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B MINING tcp 192.168.1.5:49298 -> 99.83.212.14:5000 ESTABLISHED:FIN_WAIT_2 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B VPN tcp 192.168.15.7:34363 (192.168.1.5:49298) -> 99.83.212.14:5000 FIN_WAIT_2:ESTABLISHED 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B MINING tcp 192.168.1.5:49300 -> 99.83.212.14:5000 ESTABLISHED:FIN_WAIT_2 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B VPN tcp 192.168.15.7:9335 (192.168.1.5:49300) -> 99.83.212.14:5000 FIN_WAIT_2:ESTABLISHED 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B MINING tcp 192.168.1.5:49302 -> 99.83.212.14:5000 ESTABLISHED:FIN_WAIT_2 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B VPN tcp 192.168.15.7:59866 (192.168.1.5:49302) -> 99.83.212.14:5000 FIN_WAIT_2:ESTABLISHED 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B MINING tcp 192.168.1.5:49306 -> 99.83.212.14:5000 ESTABLISHED:FIN_WAIT_2 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B VPN tcp 192.168.15.7:17622 (192.168.1.5:49306) -> 99.83.212.14:5000 FIN_WAIT_2:ESTABLISHED 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B MINING tcp 192.168.1.5:49308 -> 99.83.212.14:5000 ESTABLISHED:FIN_WAIT_2 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B VPN tcp 192.168.15.7:7108 (192.168.1.5:49308) -> 99.83.212.14:5000 FIN_WAIT_2:ESTABLISHED 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B MINING tcp 192.168.1.5:49310 -> 99.83.212.14:5000 ESTABLISHED:FIN_WAIT_2 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B VPN tcp 192.168.15.7:13574 (192.168.1.5:49310) -> 99.83.212.14:5000 FIN_WAIT_2:ESTABLISHED 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B MINING tcp 192.168.1.5:49316 -> 99.83.212.14:5000 ESTABLISHED:FIN_WAIT_2 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B VPN tcp 192.168.15.7:59343 (192.168.1.5:49316) -> 99.83.212.14:5000 FIN_WAIT_2:ESTABLISHED 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B MINING tcp 192.168.1.5:49320 -> 99.83.212.14:5000 ESTABLISHED:FIN_WAIT_2 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B VPN tcp 192.168.15.7:27167 (192.168.1.5:49320) -> 99.83.212.14:5000 FIN_WAIT_2:ESTABLISHED 4

And there are thousands of such connections. And all my other devices add up to 200-300.

DervilRus avatar Mar 03 '23 13:03 DervilRus

Is it possible to reduce the number of states? other miners (I will not name them here) do not create such a huge network flow, although they also switch to zil in time. I'm not very good at this, but this seems wrong to me

VPN tcp 192.168.15.7:25707 (192.168.1.5:49292) -> 99.83.212.14:5000 FIN_WAIT_2:ESTABLISHED 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B MINING tcp 192.168.1.5:49294 -> 99.83.212.14:5000 ESTABLISHED:FIN_WAIT_2 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B VPN tcp 192.168.15.7:44417 (192.168.1.5:49294) -> 99.83.212.14:5000 FIN_WAIT_2:ESTABLISHED 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B MINING tcp 192.168.1.5:49298 -> 99.83.212.14:5000 ESTABLISHED:FIN_WAIT_2 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B VPN tcp 192.168.15.7:34363 (192.168.1.5:49298) -> 99.83.212.14:5000 FIN_WAIT_2:ESTABLISHED 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B MINING tcp 192.168.1.5:49300 -> 99.83.212.14:5000 ESTABLISHED:FIN_WAIT_2 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B VPN tcp 192.168.15.7:9335 (192.168.1.5:49300) -> 99.83.212.14:5000 FIN_WAIT_2:ESTABLISHED 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B MINING tcp 192.168.1.5:49302 -> 99.83.212.14:5000 ESTABLISHED:FIN_WAIT_2 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B VPN tcp 192.168.15.7:59866 (192.168.1.5:49302) -> 99.83.212.14:5000 FIN_WAIT_2:ESTABLISHED 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B MINING tcp 192.168.1.5:49306 -> 99.83.212.14:5000 ESTABLISHED:FIN_WAIT_2 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B VPN tcp 192.168.15.7:17622 (192.168.1.5:49306) -> 99.83.212.14:5000 FIN_WAIT_2:ESTABLISHED 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B MINING tcp 192.168.1.5:49308 -> 99.83.212.14:5000 ESTABLISHED:FIN_WAIT_2 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B VPN tcp 192.168.15.7:7108 (192.168.1.5:49308) -> 99.83.212.14:5000 FIN_WAIT_2:ESTABLISHED 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B MINING tcp 192.168.1.5:49310 -> 99.83.212.14:5000 ESTABLISHED:FIN_WAIT_2 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B VPN tcp 192.168.15.7:13574 (192.168.1.5:49310) -> 99.83.212.14:5000 FIN_WAIT_2:ESTABLISHED 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B MINING tcp 192.168.1.5:49316 -> 99.83.212.14:5000 ESTABLISHED:FIN_WAIT_2 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B VPN tcp 192.168.15.7:59343 (192.168.1.5:49316) -> 99.83.212.14:5000 FIN_WAIT_2:ESTABLISHED 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B MINING tcp 192.168.1.5:49320 -> 99.83.212.14:5000 ESTABLISHED:FIN_WAIT_2 4 / 3 396 B / 164 B VPN tcp 192.168.15.7:27167 (192.168.1.5:49320) -> 99.83.212.14:5000 FIN_WAIT_2:ESTABLISHED 4

And there are thousands of such connections. And all my other devices add up to 200-300.

Sure that will be solve with the release in lolMiner... you are right is a small ping to check if ZIL start... Not the best way, it was a fast way until it is properly coded in the miner. I'm sure we will see it quite soon working as you desire

jgonzis avatar Mar 03 '23 15:03 jgonzis

I still have many rejected shares under 1.69

djRicky avatar Mar 03 '23 22:03 djRicky

I still have many rejected shares under 1.70 to nicehash I can see the message "Share is stale (78ms)" under HiveOS but under Nicehash was rejected

djRicky avatar Mar 13 '23 11:03 djRicky

image

djRicky avatar Mar 13 '23 13:03 djRicky

You cannot connect without the ETHV1 to nicehash, he use nicehash proto

jgonzis avatar Mar 13 '23 20:03 jgonzis

You cannot connect without the ETHV1 to nicehash, he use nicehash proto

As you can see in my first post, I already use the --ethstratum ETHV1 parameter.

djRicky avatar Mar 14 '23 15:03 djRicky