Living-with-machines
analyse workshop feedback
@kallewesterling's doc for application & feedback review
Data to analyse
Spring 2024 participant lists & feedback results
Note about Spring: we forgot (!!!) to take attendance, so I don't have a complete list of who attended vs who was accepted.
Summer applications application form
Summer feedback maps
Autumn applications
Autumn registrations
Autumn feedback maps
Spatial Humanities applications
Things to analyse:
- what kind of people applied?
- what kind of people attended?
- what feedback questions can we compare across spring/summer/autumn? I think we made some minimal changes between spring and summer, but after they should be the same (except the extra questions at the end of the summer workshop for Dave & co re: RSE network)
Nov 27 meeting
- For March meeting, we want to have a roadmap that we can get feedback on.
End result:
- Report all the workshops (to AHRC) [we don't know what that report will look like]
- very basic statistics
- key quotes
- general profile of people who applied + attended [good to show that we accepted the "correct" people]
- Kalle will work on this
- Using the data in "the MapReader chapter" = tell the story about the workshop through statistics + quotes
- Roadmap
- what can we learn from stats + feedback to inform the roadmap?
- [needs progress on roadmap for us to know what evidence we need to justify certain propositions]
Action points:
- [ ] get data out of forms, and into a spreadsheet = top level review
- [ ] qualitative statements
- [ ] Kalle + Katie will have a walkthrough of the document
- [ ] Kalle to do a rough draft of what a roadmap would look like, in their mind
I have plopped some early graphs into the Word document that I've made manually in Figma. I think we need to think about what it is that we need to know from the responses... so start with modelling what we want the resulting report/output to be..
