Lilith Orion Hafner

I'm going to re-open this with the understanding that it is unlikely to be fixed soon but would be nice to fix eventually and plans are already in the works...

`lcm(Int[])` should be 1. In this case the range of the function is `Int` or the integers and in either case, all elements of the range are multiples of every...

I recently ran into a situation where this would be useful. I think it is a worthwhile feature to implement.

This leak happens even if we only interpolate an integer instead of a vector: ```julia-repl julia> using BenchmarkTools julia> function g(n) @belapsed begin x = rand() for i in 1:$n...

The way Chairmarks handles it is by using a single macro name for both individual and plural benchmarks. You could wrap that like this ```julia macro your_macro_name(args...) postprocess(@be args...) end...

This does not reproduce on 1.10. ```julia-repl julia> versioninfo() Julia Version 1.10.9 Commit 5595d20a287 (2025-03-10 12:51 UTC) Build Info: Official https://julialang.org/ release Platform Info: OS: Linux (aarch64-linux-gnu) CPU: 8 ×...

Bump; I would be more than happy to submit a PR if it would be welcome.

Other problems: https://validator.w3.org/nu/?doc=https%3A%2F%2Fjulialang.org%2F (maybe these are Franklin.jl bugs?)

Yes. Dropping the closing tag is valid. However, also noting that the tag is present on other pages (e.g. https://www.julialang.org/downloads), that omitting the tag saves very little bandwidth, and that...

Also, I think it's nice to serve valid XML if it's not too much trouble (and xml requires matched tags).