Philip McGrath

I've confirmed that this has been fixed with the latest snapshot. In a fresh Ubuntu 22.04 container **without** the `libssl-dev` package installed: ``` root@912c45c2a7c6:/# /usr/local/racket/bin/racket Welcome to Racket v8.5 [cs]....

(I wonder if we could improve the error message in the original post, though.)

From https://github.com/racket/racket/pull/3760#issuecomment-945024650 (see also @samth's reply), this is what I think the `info.rkt` file for `draw-aarch64-macosx-3` should say: ```racket (define license '((Apache-2.0 OR MIT) ;; Racket code AND (MIT ;;...

Another case I know isn't resolved yet is https://github.com/racket/swindle/pull/1. I'll ping the SPDX people again about https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/pull/1346.

I'm working on the binary libraries in https://github.com/racket/libs/pull/4.

Here are a few initial thoughts: 1. In https://github.com/racket/racket/pull/3869, I raised the possibility of generating https://github.com/racket/racket/blob/master/racket/src/LICENSE.txt and https://github.com/racket/racket/blob/master/LICENSE.txt from https://github.com/racket/racket/blob/master/pkgs/racket-index/scribblings/main/license.scrbl to avoid having the two get out of sync in...

There's some related discussion at https://github.com/racket/racket/issues/4270, https://github.com/racket/racket/issues/4277 , and https://github.com/racket/libs/pull/3.

> > I don't think that Racket itself should include tools that manage license information, but I'm glad that @sorawee is creating one. This is also, for example, how Rust...

> * A multi-collection package variant where one package shows correctly how to distribute a third party DLL/so/etc for several platforms, and where the license differs for the rkt part...

I haven't tried this, but one approach I think would work today would be to: 1. For each package containing unwanted binary libraries, prepare a stub package without the binaries...