MAD-GANs
MAD-GANs copied to clipboard
The performance of the experiment fall short of the results of the paper
The best of the f1 score that I got is 0.3764 testing with the SWaT data. Is there some hyper parameters that I need to adjust to get close to the score on the paper? (0.77) I trained the model with the default configuration.
Same problem. I have got some poor performances on the SWaT data.
Hey, Did you get to implement the code without issues?
Hey, Did you get to implement the code without issues?
Nope
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 9:24 PM Adapter525 @.***> wrote:
Hey, Did you get to implement the code without issues?
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/LiDan456/MAD-GANs/issues/6#issuecomment-974744171, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHSUXJRG2ONVWC4YHEYEWBTUNBJ47ANCNFSM4IZHXQTQ . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.
Same problem,and each result is different.
Same problem,and each result is different.
@123YuanyuanWang 你找到问题所在了吗?我也AD效果也不好
The best of the f1 score that I got is 0.3764 testing with the SWaT data. Is there some hyper parameters that I need to adjust to get close to the score on the paper? (0.77) I trained the model with the default configuration.
@JuneKyu same. did you figure it out?
结果同样不理想,换其他模型吧。这个论文结果是将阈值不断调整,并测试每一代模型的最好结果。 论文原文也说明了只是做出了时序上的尝试,结果不好。 而且深究一下,代码里面还有不少错误,比如训练与测试集没有用同一个pca模型降维等等。
达利园? @.***
------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "LiDan456/MAD-GANs" @.>; 发送时间: 2023年3月14日(星期二) 晚上7:39 @.>; @.@.>; 主题: Re: [LiDan456/MAD-GANs] The performance of the experiment fall short of the results of the paper (#6)
Same problem,and each result is different.
@123YuanyuanWang 你找到问题所在了吗?我也AD效果也不好
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
结果同样不理想,换其他模型吧。这个论文结果是将阈值不断调整,并测试每一代模型的最好结果。 论文原文也说明了只是做出了时序上的尝试,结果不好。 而且深究一下,代码里面还有不少错误,比如训练与测试集没有用同一个pca模型降维等等。 达利园? @.*** … ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "LiDan456/MAD-GANs" @.>; 发送时间: 2023年3月14日(星期二) 晚上7:39 @.>; @.@.>; 主题: Re: [LiDan456/MAD-GANs] The performance of the experiment fall short of the results of the paper (#6) Same problem,and each result is different. @123YuanyuanWang 你找到问题所在了吗?我也AD效果也不好 — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
@123YuanyuanWang 我本科毕业论文就是这个题目。用GAN处理时间序列的模型好想不多,TAnoGAN还是处理的单变量时间序列。多变量的时间序列就找到这一个哎。这几天我试了好几次,达不到她论文里面写的结果90几的准确率和召回率。或许代码里哪里可以调整阈值呢?或许还有什么模型比较好呢,愿闻其详