Léo Colombaro

Thanks for filing this issue, @D1StrX. > And why does Netbox-worker need access to Netbox-media? That's a good point. Would removing this mount resolve the issue you're facing?

Makes sense. Then what's blocking to use the proper `ReadWriteMany` access mode? That would be the exact use case for this.

As far as I understand, it does, just not [when using Compute Engine disks](https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/persistent-volumes#access_modes). I might be wrong, but if so, do you have any reference?

I honestly don't know what can be done in this repository for this case. The fact GKE doesn't support `ReadWriteMany` volumes for some context is quite outside our expertise/ability to...

Please give version 5.0.0-beta.137 (or above) a try. A new option has been added to allow read only volume mounts (`housekeeping.readOnlyPersistence`, `worker.readOnlyPersistence`). I believe `ReadOnlyMany` should then be an adequate...

Thanks for filing this issue, @pimvandenbroek. > * Jumped into the netbox-pod, and did the same. This also worked fine > * Created a django app, purely for uploading a...

For your information, this has been documented on the Docker image wiki: https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox-docker/wiki/Troubleshooting#netbox-container-doesnt-start-when-ipv6-is-disabled With the use of `overrideUnitConfig` in the values, the workaround is fairly simple. https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox-chart/blob/190868ca133844c63019e5672ea73d773096d25f/charts/netbox/values.yaml#L476-L516 Closing in favor...

> Honestly at this stage I think it would be great if you could submit PRs for some of those things Sure, the first batch has been submitted 👍 Quite...

I'm closing this pull request as per lack of contributor reply. As mentioned by @bootc, this seems to be mostly, if not all, doable with a proper use of available...

Closing as stale, and with proper support provided already. @ybizeul Don't hesitate to reopen if this is still an issue.