LeeTibbert

Results 142 issues of LeeTibbert

The JVM 8 [documentation](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/lang/Process.html#waitFor-long-java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit-) explicitly describes several `Process.waitFor` methods as capable of returning `InterruptedException`. Java 22, and presumably intermediate versions, allow this capability. PR #3946 explicitly _disallows_ this capability and...

Fix #4003 ##### Prologue It is too early (and expensive) for a 0.6.n now. I am creating this PR for review and in case I get hit by the proverbial...

component:javalib

This is to capture the need/desire for some work which, IIUC, will require waiting for a SN 0.6.n branch to be opened. I understand entirely and appreciate the reasons, especically...

Java 17, and perhaps earlier seems to allow one to test for the presence or absence of the `@Deprecated` annotation in generated code. Does Scala allow this? Does Scala Native?...

This may read like a whine, but it is really a "forget-me-not". Whilst working on what is now PR #3997, I became aware, like a freight car hitting you, that...

Investigating Issue #3988 quickly, well quickly for geological time, leads to Issue #3503. That Issue describes a need for javalib to implement the improvements in JEP 431 (Java Enhancement Proposal)...

The javalib `java.util.List` class could benefit from a week spent on it, and its tests. The overall Issue is that `List` is missing a number of static and default methods....

##### Presenting problem Please consider the following code, using the Scala Native `unit-test` environment: ``` class MumbleTest { val negZeroD = jl.Double.valueOf(-0.0d) val posZeroD = jl.Double.valueOf(+0.0d) val negZeroF = jl.Float.valueOf(-0.0f)...

bug

###### Presenting problem ``` @Test def divideByNegativeZeroIsNegativeInfinity(): Unit = { // This test uses Double, Float has the same flaw. // Both fail with various versions of: // Scala Native...

bug

Recent changes to `jsoniter-scala-core/native/src/main/resources/scala-native/multiply_high.c` have advanced the discussion. I do have a concern about one section of code. Please forgive me if I have missed something, either obvious or subtle....

enhancement