LeeTibbert

Wojciech, Thank you for the current information. Gratifying to know that the SN compiler continues to silently inline the cases where I had expected it to do so. The information...

Arman, Not to be dense, is this Issue a placeholder for a SN PR you are preparing or a request that it be done? If the latter, I would be...

> That would be excellent, thank you so much! Baton passed. Any thoughts about concurrency? I will probably use the concurrent map until/unless someone with knowledge & experience tells me...

Status update * I/we need to use `HashMap` rather than `ConcurrentHashMap` because the latter specifies an upper type bound of AnyRef and the definition the type of the 'value' for...

Err? I'm only the messenger. Starting from this discussion and an understanding and appreciation that Scala.js and current Scala Native code are good guides up until the point they are...

Folks, Any guesses at to a good initial size for the internal `ConcurrentHashMap` in `ClassValue`? Because code can create them, there is, IIUC, a potentially effectively infinite number of types....

State of the discussion; When I make the changes above, the build still breaks, seeking an undocumented inner class. ``` (javalib3 / Compile / compileIncremental) java.lang.AssertionError: assertion failed: failure to...

> As a workaround we always define the required types outside the ValueClass companion I free associated on this suggestion and it broke the log jam. Thank you. In my...

@armanbilge * Is it still likely that you will be using `ClassValue`? * A friendly question, if you please: I have a sandbox implementation that keeps the classValue value in...

@armanbilge And thank you for releasing the resource. Yes, let's take a pause. For me, time spent learning is never wasted. One never knows when the knowledge will be useful...