LeeTibbert

Dang! And the paint on #2640 is not even dry yet... Seriously, thank you for the Issue & the reproducer. Sorry you experienced it and it took your time. Some...

re: Shouldn't we be trying to make our implementation match the JVM? Agreed, passionately, as a goal. Sometimes that is just too difficult. I have been involved on another PR...

My understanding of the issue is that JVM supports "\\uNNNN" as well as "\uNNNN". On a fast read, it looks to me that this is a JVM special case. When...

@sideeffffect /cc @lolgab Thank you for these changes, they will make the next steps of adding Zio support easier. I am actively working on providing some prerequisites for Zio and...

@MasseGuillaume, thank you for paying attention to this issue. 1. The sbt-cross-example README.md, after the pending PR, looks good. Short & sweet yet gives the essential toehold. 2. Masse/Guillaume/.../better-do#cross-platform-compilation-support also...

@ulfjack I just tried to replicate this issue as part of my efforts to port RYU to Scala Native. Please pardon any lack of understanding or stupidity on my part,...

@ulfjack Thank you for the additional description. Java does not have as long a history as C but it still has 25 or so years of use "in the wild"....

Some say that Java is defined by its abundant implementation "quirks". Many have grumbled that any attempt to match Java results by a rational means or specification is doomed. I...

The problem shows itself in `InetAddress.getByName()` but the root causes appear to lie deeper in the call chain. AF_INET needs to be specified in 5(?) or so places. The proposed...

See the closing comment in never-merged PR #2848. The proposed fix breaks applications which have come to rely upon the behavior. Solution is to wait for 0.5.0.