Handle buffs using priority queue

[danil179]

Remove timers and use proper tick system to handle the buffs using priority queue of duration and order. This will assure efficient & correct handling of buffs.

[lzardy]

Resolved via #954

[danil179]

@microsoftv It wasn't resolved, as buffs don't use priority queue yet.

[lzardy]

What do you mean by priority queue then? As far as I can see I handle buffs by duration and order. Oldest buff has the lowest index.

[danil179]

@microsoftv https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priority_queue The running times are much better with this data structure (no iteration)

[superewald]

Remove timers and use proper tick system to handle the buffs using priority queue of duration and order. This will assure efficient & correct handling of buffs.

@danil179 Should we realy use Buff.Duration for that or rather implement a Buff.Priority which defaults to Buff.Duration ? This way we could overwrite the priority easily if needed.

[danil179]

@superewald I think that there are cases when 2 buffs start in the same time and then we want priority. So it is good to have a field Buff.Priority. Currently, let's just copy the duration, and later we will add the another 2nd number (so it will be like vector2 with specific comparison) that decides these cases.