Olof Lagerkvist

> what about removing the object from the dokanfileinfo and adding an out parameter in createfile ? that would make sense, except for the added api change Not sure I...

The parameters to ZwCreateFile etc need to be the way they are to maintain compatibility with the C++ dll. Also, it would not give any particular performance gain to wrap...

Okay, but really, there is really no performance difference between marshalling fields in a structure compared to parameters. It is basically the same thing.

If we are talking about native C++, in my opinion the idea of allocating a struct on stack and send a pointer to it in function calls made a lot...

That is a really nice solution. If it is turned into a blittable struct in the .NET world it can be immediately mapped as a .NET struct without any marshalling...

I experienced the same problem. I thought about using it to auto-answer calls on a remote computer without anyone logged on, but it seems that Linphone on Windows only works...

> Sure. I did not want to discomfort anyone. However, as this is really a good project and for sure used by many, a dev using it will now need...

> I'm not saying I would do that, but what are the criteria for stepping in to the project? > > I'd like to keep the code "compatible", but also...

Those are good questions and it reminds me about the idea I had for a while about adding a list of things currently not supported but various parts of the...

> * New features or new FS support is not so important. I think the container formats and the FS formats supported are very long living standards and DiscUtils is...