Lennart Schüler
Lennart Schüler
Thank you for the changes. However, now there is an inconsistency between the argument to choose your estimator, which is "madogram" and the docstring describing the estimator, which is "f-madogram"....
Hi Joshua, it's great to hear from you again! I think `pip` surpresses all output from within `setup.py`. You can try passing the verbose flag like `pip install -e ....
Hi, your field in Fig. 1 does not look lognormally distributed. Try replacing your line `gs.transform.normal_to_lognormal(srf)` with `srf.transform('normal_to_lognormal')`. Sorry, I don't know what you mean by "the number of truncations...
Thanks for providing the script :+1: I guess the reason is that you only sample very few correlation lengths. I just ran your script, but with `len_scale=1.0` and this is...
Yeah, there is definitely something wrong with the length scales. Here is a script to estimate the variograms, which also gives you the actual length scale of a field. If...
Yeah, I think the final problem to solve is the scaling of the Fourier modes. This is an example, where I manually figured out the rescaling for one specific set...
> Please rebase with main. Good idea :sweat_smile:
Sorry, it was late last evening... I just fixed that problem.
Wow, this was a looong journey. But I think we are finally there. We did a lot of testing in the background and the Fourier method seems to be working...
I merged the main branch and I also implemented the Fourier method in GSTools-Core, so included that import in GSTools, if GSTools-Core is available.