LSSTDESC
Add sensor height map to batoid telescope model
Adds sensor height map data to batoid telescope model. The height data comes from https://ls.st/doc-37242. The more detailed measurements there are fit, for each sensor, to a Zernike model which I evaluate here. Also included is a script to make a focal plane height map for comparison to the docushare document. Here's the actual comparison:
From Doc-37242
From imsim script:
There's enough similarity to convince me I got the signs and coordinates right, even if there are some offsets too (though note, it was hard to match colorbars).
Finally, I had to tweak batoid a bit to make this, so it won't pass CI until that's updated. I wanted to make the PR while this was fresh in my memory though.
Ask Andy Rasmussen, he should be able to locate height data if this was collected for the ComCam raft
Prof. Aaron Roodman Deputy Director Vera C. Rubin Observatory Dept. of Particle Physics & Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics & Cosmology SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Stanford University
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory E-mail: @.@.> 2575 Sand Hill Rd. Phone: 650-926-2705 MS 29 Menlo Park, CA 94025 URL: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~roodman
From: Chris Walter @.> Date: Thursday, March 7, 2024 at 8:15 AM To: LSSTDESC/imSim @.> Cc: Subscribed @.***> Subject: Re: [LSSTDESC/imSim] Add sensor height map to batoid telescope model (PR #451)
Do we have the info to do the same for the ComCam model?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/LSSTDESC/imSim/pull/451#issuecomment-1983875720, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABARV4YF2NVUD4B7N5RN2ULYXCG77AVCNFSM6AAAAABECRMQPCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSOBTHA3TKNZSGA. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
@jmeyers314 I think something's wonky in the trascription between the focal plane sensor fit zernike coefficients. First of all it looks almost like there's a vignetting pattern that drops off at field positions >1.75deg or so that makes the surface height of the sensors drop off. I'll need to check these maps against the actual in-situ measurements for which we also didn't have full reach because of the displacement sensor's plane of reflection. I'll post other problems I think I'm seeing but need to be sure first.
