Lucas Pardue
Lucas Pardue
A pending ToC change might, in part, address this issue; see https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/3199
Most of the discussion is besides the point of the issue I created. Please stay on topic. The proposal is to change the design and that would allow parallel upload....
How is this proposal better than the current solution?
This does not sound infinitely better to me. The client is asking the server to create state without any indication of the properties of the upload object.
I suggest writing a full design out to ensure that all aspects of your proposal are laid out and understood, such as by writing an Internet-Draft that can be read...
Thats a decision for the chairs to make. The authors plan to address the editorial and minor design issues that have been raised by mid-september.
The proposal to keep uploading chunks of data that might have been received and processed (in whole or in-part) sounds to me like it could create conditions where a client...
So the answer to my question > Does your proposal offer any way to avoid such resource spending by allowing a a client to get an accurate view of precisely...
What is the client is sending in parallel? Is there a way to query the precise ranges that have been processed and received? A server can respond prior to receiving...
> Aside: I do not understand what you mean by "processed" as in both resumable uploads and my temporary resource proposal, the temporary resource is collected until Upload-Complete: ?1 (or...