HDF5 largefile test fails on Debian

[aowen87]

On Debian Linux x86, the HDF5 Largefile test fails: 51. testsuite.at:276: testing largefile ..../testsuite.at:278: test "$STARGS" != DB_HDF5 && exit 77 || $VALGRIND largefilestderr:stdout:Creating file: 'largefile.silo'Iterations 0000 to 0099 of 2500Iterations 0100 to 0199 of 2500Iterations 0200 to 0299 of 2500Iterations 0300 to 0399 of 2500Iterations 0400 to 0499 of 2500Iterations 0500 to 0599 of 2500Iterations 0600 to 0699 of 2500Iterations 0700 to 0799 of 2500Iterations 0800 to 0899 of 2500Iterations 0900 to 0999 of 2500Iterations 1000 to 1099 of 2500Iterations 1100 to 1199 of 2500Iterations 1200 to 1299 of 2500Iterations 1300 to 1399 of 2500Iterations 1400 to 1499 of 2500Iterations 1500 to 1599 of 2500Iterations 1600 to 1699 of 2500Iterations 1700 to 1799 of 2500Iterations 1800 to 1899 of 2500Iterations 1900 to 1999 of 2500Iterations 2000 to 2099 of 2500Iterations 2100 to 2199 of 2500Iterations 2200 to 2299 of 2500Iterations 2300 to 2399 of 2500Iterations 2400 to 2499 of 2500Reopening 'largefile.silo'Read error in "simple_0393" at position 0001. Expected 103022593.000000, got 103022592.000000Read error in "simple_0153" at position 0001. Expected 40108033.000000, got 40108032.000000Read error in "simple_0147" at position 0001. Expected 38535169.000000, got 38535168.000000Read error in "simple_0437" at position 0001. Expected 114556929.000000, got 114556928.000000Read error in "simple_0394" at position 0001. Expected 103284737.000000, got 103284736.000000 Note: when using python2.6, the HDF5 tests are marked "skipped", but run with using python2.7.Not sure why this is. The above failure was using python2.7

-----------------------REDMINE MIGRATION----------------------- This ticket was migrated from Redmine. As such, not all information was able to be captured in the transition. Below is a complete record of the original redmine ticket.

Ticket number: 745 Status: New Project: VisIt Tracker: Bug Priority: Normal Subject: HDF5 largefile test fails on Debian Assigned to: - Category: - Target version: - Author: Alastair McKinstry Start: 06/09/2011 Due date: % Done: 0% Estimated time: Created: 06/09/2011 07:20 am Updated: Likelihood: 5 - Always Severity: 2 - Minor Irritation Found in version: 4.8 Impact: Expected Use: OS: All Support Group: Any Description: On Debian Linux x86, the HDF5 Largefile test fails: 51. testsuite.at:276: testing largefile ..../testsuite.at:278: test "$STARGS" != DB_HDF5 && exit 77 || $VALGRIND largefilestderr:stdout:Creating file: 'largefile.silo'Iterations 0000 to 0099 of 2500Iterations 0100 to 0199 of 2500Iterations 0200 to 0299 of 2500Iterations 0300 to 0399 of 2500Iterations 0400 to 0499 of 2500Iterations 0500 to 0599 of 2500Iterations 0600 to 0699 of 2500Iterations 0700 to 0799 of 2500Iterations 0800 to 0899 of 2500Iterations 0900 to 0999 of 2500Iterations 1000 to 1099 of 2500Iterations 1100 to 1199 of 2500Iterations 1200 to 1299 of 2500Iterations 1300 to 1399 of 2500Iterations 1400 to 1499 of 2500Iterations 1500 to 1599 of 2500Iterations 1600 to 1699 of 2500Iterations 1700 to 1799 of 2500Iterations 1800 to 1899 of 2500Iterations 1900 to 1999 of 2500Iterations 2000 to 2099 of 2500Iterations 2100 to 2199 of 2500Iterations 2200 to 2299 of 2500Iterations 2300 to 2399 of 2500Iterations 2400 to 2499 of 2500Reopening 'largefile.silo'Read error in "simple_0393" at position 0001. Expected 103022593.000000, got 103022592.000000Read error in "simple_0153" at position 0001. Expected 40108033.000000, got 40108032.000000Read error in "simple_0147" at position 0001. Expected 38535169.000000, got 38535168.000000Read error in "simple_0437" at position 0001. Expected 114556929.000000, got 114556928.000000Read error in "simple_0394" at position 0001. Expected 103284737.000000, got 103284736.000000 Note: when using python2.6, the HDF5 tests are marked "skipped", but run with using python2.7.Not sure why this is. The above failure was using python2.7

Comments: