Gökhan Kurt
Gökhan Kurt
Anyone already working on this? I will give it a go otherwise.
I have a basic working implementation at #316. [CodeSandbox example](https://codesandbox.io/p/devbox/4w7pfx)
I created a fork until the PR above is merged. You can try the fork with `npm i -D vite-plugin-checker-biome`
This seems to happen when the element has percentage width and its parent has `auto` width. I thought Yoga would handle this case, but apparently it does not. This requires...
The issue is still reproducible in v19 canary. Stackblitz example [here](https://stackblitz.com/edit/vitejs-vite-jbhxne?file=src%2Fmain.tsx).
> In which renderers would that be a problem? I noticed this in [my custom renderer for Unity](https://github.com/ReactUnity/renderer). Due to the nature of the platform, host instance creation had side-effects....
As long as it is intended, it is not an issue for me. It is just a tiny bit wasteful in terms of performance, but not a big priority.
> Hopefully we can get close to a packaging implementation that we can trust. Is the test suite for that absolutely necessary? Imho, we find a working configuration, test it...
@mike-lischke "Masquerading as ESM" shouldn't cause any problems as long as you are not using default exports. It may not need a fix. I will try out your implementation too,...
As this is not getting merged, I am going to create a temporary fork and merge this there. I want to get out of ESlint ecosystem soon and this is...