Kristoffer Carlsson
Kristoffer Carlsson
> I think the way many editors handle this is that when you type the final " it replaces the one that's already there. Not sure what the full logic...
Thanks, this seems to be a bug with the new parser we changed to. Will file an upstream issue.
https://github.com/JuliaLang/JuliaSyntax.jl/issues/232
https://github.com/JuliaLang/JuliaSyntax.jl/pull/233 should fix it I thjink
Good to go?
The issue here is that you are doing a jldoctest but you do not include the `julia>` prompt. Doing it as: ``` """ foo(x) A function called foo. Example =======...
> Is this expected to collide with OhMyREPL in any way? Not until it is enabled in the REPL. Once it is and it works as well or better as...
"Interface" packages and "Core" packages should have no purpose now that "package extensions" are available (or at least will be available in 1.9).
Does anyone have a simple repro for this?
Yeah, I think all the uses of the `IOBuffer` internals has to be removed. https://github.com/JuliaWeb/HTTP.jl/pull/1145 and https://github.com/JuliaWeb/HTTP.jl/pull/1147 has started that work.