Kratos
Kratos copied to clipboard
KratosMultiphysics
[StructuralMechanicsApplication] Adding patch test for axisymmetry
📝 Description
Adding patch test for axisymmetry
🆕 Changelog
- Adding patch test for axisymmetry
@AlejandroCornejo the test fails, by a lot, any idea why?
Can it be because the geometry has non-positive
xcomponents?
Huuuuuuuuum, let me see
actually not, I've checked
Faster than me
The element I'm pretty sure that is fine cause I've compared the result with another solver (Ramseries) and works fine. Maybe I'm wrong hehe
The element I'm pretty sure that is fine cause I've compared the result with another solver (Ramseries) and works fine. Maybe I'm wrong hehe
Could be..., what I don't understand is why your cpp test works
The element I'm pretty sure that is fine cause I've compared the result with another solver (Ramseries) and works fine. Maybe I'm wrong hehe
Could be..., what I don't understand is why your cpp test works
well my cpp is simpler, I'm only comparing stresses comparing with the current status, not against any analytical value. (I assumed that was ok)
I suppose that the ordering of the nodes within the elements is consistent and not generating negative jacobians
I suppose that the ordering of the nodes within the elements is consistent and not generating negative jacobians
A priori is the same geometry as the regular 2D tests
And what about the 2*PI factor? does it have to be taken into account somehow in the test?
And what about the 2*PI factor? does it have to be taken into account somehow in the test?
I would say that the displacements are the same. The 2Pi is to integrate