Renato Golia

Thanks for trying this :) I like the approach you're taking. I just wonder if `AcceptedArns` should be merged or replaced. I can see the value of both approaches. As...

Are @devklick and @kpenergy the same person? 🤔

@devklick thanks for your effort. Usually when I have to test stuff that uses `Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration` and `Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection` I end up using the concrete types rather than mocking the interfaces. I...

Hi @HK8080, Thanks for posting your issue and I'm glad you find this library helpful! Unfortunately, I never used Localstack so I don't have any direct experience. Maybe @Erwinvandervalk, who...

I'm not sure it would help my case (although I barely remember what I was working on back then). I guess this would go in hand with the default registration...

Thanks! I'll check later :)

@PureKrome an idea would be to have a default case (either 200 or 500) that works without any seutp...

Anyway there is no need for a default constructor (although it might be better having it). The important thing is to have read/write access to the list of conditions.

> > Anyway there is no need for a default constructor > > I thought you said AutoFac can't create an instance of the class because it requires an empty...

I'm also interested into this. I'm trying to generate a library that targets both `netstandard2.1` and `net6.0`.