[K2] Properties inherited from Java fields/synthetic properties with types that can be nullable shown as nullable

[atyrin]

// Java:
public class Parent {
    public String parentField;
}

// Kotlin:
class Child: Parent()

In K1 the parentField on Child page shown as a String

In K2 in it String?

Probably it is a good practice to consider Java code as nullable, but formally it is not a correct type.

NB: on Parent page Dokka shows a non-nullable type String

• Dokka version: 2.0.0

[vmishenev]

Although types from Java are flexible-nullable in Kotlin, Dokka does not support such types—String! (at least for Documentable). Currently, the nullable String? seems to be a more accurate way to present these types than just String in K1.