server as struct
Is there a valid reason for using functions only? Using a struct for the REST-server would be better style and clear.
Client is a struct. Why not server?
The "server" only does one thing. It routes HTTP requests. It doesn't do anything else. The data needed to make that mapping is stored in a package global map (resources).
The server (excluding helper methods) consists of two functions: resourceHandler and Resource.
Resource registers a path (for a resource) with the http package and sets resourceHandler as the handler. It also stores the mapping between a resource name (the path) and the object which has the functions to call.
resourceHandler is called by the http package when a registered route (in http) is requested. It then figures out which object (resource) should respond to that request and makes the right function call.
The resource can be a struct. It can be any whatever data type you need to represent your resource.
Nathan
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 16:29, Kissaki [email protected] wrote:
Is there a valid reason for using functions only? Using a struct for the REST-server would be better style and clear.
Client is a struct. Why not server?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/Kissaki/rest.go/issues/13
Yeah. So, what speaks for not defining a struct is that it is just 2 methods. Anything else?