MedSegDiff icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
MedSegDiff copied to clipboard

Reproduced ISIC 2018 experiments, but results are much worse than reported

Open shivaprogrammer opened this issue 3 months ago • 0 comments

I tried to reproduce the ISIC 2018 experiments as described in the MedSegDiff paper (Paper 2). I followed the repo instructions and trained/evaluated the model on ISIC 2018.

However, my results are much lower than those reported in the paper. Specifically:

IoU: 0.1628

Dice: 0.2706

This is significantly worse than the paper’s reported numbers.

Could you please clarify:

The exact data split you used for ISIC 2018 (train/val/test)?

Any preprocessing steps (e.g., normalization, resizing, augmentation) that may not be included in the repo?

The hyperparameters or training schedule you used for ISIC 2018?

shivaprogrammer avatar Sep 08 '25 10:09 shivaprogrammer