JNI improvements

[javagl]

Addresses https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/issues/880

I know, the title is too generic. It would be better to clearly lay out a work plan and create a clean sequence of self-contained, specific PRs. But there are just too many (unrelated) things to do. "You can't cross a chasm in two small jumps". The first pass has to be tackled somewhat holistically. The result may not be as 'good' as I'd like it to be, but I hope that it will be 'better' along many dimensions. If this is not considered to be a viable approach, then that's OK. Then I'll just create my own repo with JNI bindings for KTX, with blackjack and error handling.

---

The preliminary task list that I tried to create in the linked issue is now replicated here, and I'll try to update it and extend it as we move on:

• [x] Wrap up https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/pull/876
• [x] Wrap up https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/pull/879
• [x] Expose CreateFromMemory
• [x] Improve the use of constants
  • There should be documentation for these constants, and stringFor ... methods to convert them to strings
  • Updates:

    • Aligned the names of all constants with the native version

    • Aligned the names of constants with the other bindings (see https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/pull/886#issuecomment-2308404357 )

    • Added documentation and string functions for all constants, except for...

      • KtxInternalformat
      • VkFormat

      (See https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/issues/887 )

    • NOTES:

      • The ktxTexture2.supercompressionScheme does not appear in the native documentation
      • The constants for KtxPackAstcEncoderMode are not documented on the native side
• [x] Fix the KtxTestLibraryLoader to also work on Windows
• [x] The JNI class- and field initializations should only be done once. Right now, things like env->GetFieldID(ktx_texture_class, "instance", "J"); are called in each function. The jfieldID should be obtained once initially.
• [x] (continuously) Error checks, error checks, error checks ... (no JVM crashes, period!)
  • Updates (I did a first pass for this, but will keep an eye on places where checks have to be added):
    • Passing null to any method should throw a NullPointerException.
    • Trying to use a texture after destroy() was called should throw an IllegalStateException.
    • When a JNI function causes an error (like an out-of-memory error), then the native functions have to return immediately, because there is a pending exception. This is not done in all places yet...
    • Java methods that do not return error codes (like the create... methods) now generally throw a KtxException when the implementation caused an error code that was not KTX_SUCCESS
• [x] (continuously) Comments, comments, comments...
  • Updates:
    • I have added basic JavaDocs, and enabled the creation of the JavaDocs in the POM.
• [x] Add bindings for ktxErrorString

---

Not (yet) supposed to be addressed here:

• Try to find a clean solution for https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/issues/624

• There are a few cases where we might have to think about how to handle the absence of unsigned types in Java. For example, when calling createInfo.setBaseWidth(-123); // INVALID!, then this value is implicitly converted into a ktx_uint32_t.

• Update the documentation of deflateZstd and deflateZLIB EDIT: This was now done as part of https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/pull/879, but only for the native side and for the Java bindings (other bindings are still missing the doc update or the functions)

  • As pointed out in a comment, this documentation should include the information that 'the data pointer is updated'. This will go into the native documentation first, but it will also have to be passed through to the python bindings, the Java binding, and maybe to the JS binding. But... the deflateZLIB function is still missing in the Python binding (and the deflate* functions are just about to be added to the Java binding), so ... this may have to be tracked and addressed separately

• Improve thoroughness of deflate* tests by comparing the deflated values

  • As pointed out in another comment, the unit test for the deflate* functions should compare the result of inflating the data again to the original input. The inflate* methods are not yet exposed (anywhere), so this may have to be deferred for now

• Add test for input swizzling in ASTC

  • The PR for fixing the swizzling in JNI includes a test for the swizzling for Basis. It does not include one for ASTC. These are different code paths, and should both be tested. But right now, I'm not sure what could be checked for the ASTC result (see this PR comment for context).

• Consider consistent formatting. I know, it's a detail, but just auto-formatting everything with the Eclipse default could already be an improvement. I do have strong preferences for my own projects, but here, the main point is that the formatting should be consistent...

• The ktxHash... functionalities are not yet mapped through from the native side.

  • Consider following the new JS binding here. It adds findKeyValue, addKVPair and deleteKVPair methods to the ktxTexture2 object rather than exposing ktxHashList.

[javagl]

I locally started a few updates, including some basic error handling, so that things like KtxTexture2.create(null, ...) will no longer crash the JVM, but throw a NullPointerException instead. (Many more error checks to add...).

One thing that could/should be done next: The KtxTexture class has a destroy() method, documented like this:

    /**
     * Destroy the KTX texture and free memory image resources
     *
     * NOTE: If you try to use a {@link KTXTexture} after it's destroyed, that will cause a segmentation
     * fault (the texture pointer is set to NULL).
     */
    public native void destroy();

Now, the goal is: No segmentation faults. And we'll probably not be able to completely avoid this destroy() method. So the question is how to handle that.

I think that trying to use a KtxTexture after destroy() was called should also throw an exception - maybe an IllegalStateException. I'll probably draft this (with the type of the exception being easy to change). But it will affect basically each and every native function, which has to check whether the thiz parameter has been destroyed...

[javagl]

There currently are two functions in the KtxTexture... class that receive "data" in the form of byte arrays:

• public native int setImageFromMemory(int level, int layer, int faceSlice, byte[] src);
• public static native KtxTexture2 createFromMemory(ByteBuffer byteBuffer, int createFlags);

(The latter has been added as part of this PR)

Many libraries that are using JNI expect direct ByteBuffer instances as the input for all functions, for a variety of reasons. But I'm strongly in favor of additionally offering the conveniece of a byte[] array. This does come at a cost for the implementor. The different cases of arrays and direct (or non-direct...) buffer have to be handled, but ... this is doable (some utility functions to fetch and release the data are shown in the draft for createFromMemory).

On the Java side, the ByteBuffer-based signature is more versatile. Even if someone has a byte[] array, this can trivially be wrapped into a ByteBuffer at the call site:

byte array[] = ...;
t = KtxTexture2.createFromMemory(ByteBuffer.wrap(array), ...);

But as a middle-ground, I'd suggest to...

• introduce an additional setImageFromMemory(..., ByteBuffer src) method (keeping the one that accepted the byte[] array, for backward compatibility and convenience)
• Add a createFromMemory(byte array[]...) method, for consistency with the two flavors of setImageFromMemory

---

An aside: The documentation of the setImageFromMemory currently says

* Set the image data - the passed data should be not modified after passing it! The bytes
* will be kept in memory until {@link KTXTexture#destroy} is called.

This statement is not true, and will be updated accordingly.

---

Remotely related: There currently is a function public native byte[] writeToMemory(); which returns a byte[] array. This probably makes sense, but the function itself has to be reviewed and tested.

[MarkCallow]

* Set the image data - the passed data should be not modified after passing it! The bytes
* will be kept in memory until {@link KTXTexture#destroy} is called.

What does "passed data" refer to here? Is it the data at the pointer location that was passed to setImageFromMemory? Not that it matters since you say it isn't true. Indeed the data is copied into the ktxTexture object.

[javagl]

What does "passed data" refer to here? Is it the data at the pointer location that was passed to setImageFromMemory? Not that it matters since you say it isn't true. Indeed the data is copied into the ktxTexture object.

There are multiple "layers" here, and this revolves exactly about the question where data is copied. Imagine the following Java pseudo code, similar to what could appear in the KTX JNI bindings:

byte input[] = new byte[10];

// Create a texture from the input
KtxTexture2 texture = KtxTexture2.createFrom(input);

// XXX Will this affect the result?
input[5] = 123;

// Encode the input data that was given earlier
texture.encode();

The comment suggested that this input[5] = 123 would be "visible" for the 'encode' function that is called later. This would mean that the native library would store "a pointer" to the Java byte[] array. Something like this is actually possible, but with many, many, caveats - and here, it certainly is not the case.

[javagl]

A detail @ShukantPal : Currently, the bindings are set up for Java 11. I don't see a strong reason for that. Unless there is a reason, I'd suggest lowering the version requirement to "the lowest version that works" (and I think that 8 should do it).

[javagl]

EDIT: I decided to rename the constants - see https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/pull/886#issuecomment-2027307405 .

---

So the following question is obsolete:

---

For the sake of the goal of having a 1:1 mapping between C and Java, I have to ask:

• In C, the constants are prefixed like KTX_SS_BASIS_LZ or KTX_SUCCESS
• In Java, they are not prefixed, i.e. they are BASIS_LZ or SUCCESS

Should they have the same prefixes?

I would slightly lean towards having the prefixes, which may make some aspects of https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/issues/887 easier. Changing this now would be a "breaking change", but ... there are probably not sooo many users of the JNI bindings, and the break is trivial ("just add the prefixes in your code"). But that's not a strong preference.

[javagl]

I have added a bit of error handling (updating the list in the first post accordingly).

One point about error handling is that there are still some cases where the JNI layer reports errors to std::cout, and then returns NULL or so. I'm not yet sure what to do in these cases. (But I'm sure that the errors should not (only) be reported via std::cout...). I think that these cases will usually be converted into a thrown exception, and I'll decide on a case-by-case basis what kind of exception that could be. If someone has strong preferences: Chime in here.

[javagl]

Two updates:

Caching field- and method IDs

All the jfieldID and jmethodID values are now obtained once, when the library is loaded, instead of looking them up again and again in each and every method call.

Error handling

Additional checks for out-of-memory errors and such have been added.

The most significant change refers to the create... Methods - or more generally, to the methods where the Java version did not return an error code as an int: These methods generally had the pattern of (pseudocode):

KtxTexture2 create(...) {
    ktxTexture2 *instance;
    ktx_error_code_e = create(&instance);
    if (result != KTX_SUCCESS) {
        std::cout << "Something wrong " << result << std::endl;
        return NULL;
    }
    return createJavaObjectFrom(instance);
}

Now, there is no sensible method for returning the information about what went wrong here - with the exception of an exception. So these methods will now usually throw the newly added KtxException when the internal error code was not KTX_SUCCESS.

One could think about other options here. For example, one could pass an uninitialized KtxTexture2 object to the create methods, as in

KtxTexture2 texture = new KtxTexture2(); // NOT INITIALIZED!:
int result = KtxTexture2.create(..., texture); // Try to initialize it
if (result == KtxErrorCode.SUCCESS) { 
    // That worked
} else {
    // Handle this...
}

Yeah, that would be a "breaking change" - but I guess nobody really cares about that right now. I don't have a really strong preference here.

[javagl]

Responding to my own comment from above: I decided to align the constant names with the names that they have in the native layer. The prefixes already are present, for example, in the (auto-generated) classes like VkFormat. Comparing and/or maintaining the other constants when the prefixes are removed is difficult.

I know, something like KtxTextureCreateStorage.KTX_TEXTURE_CREATE_NO_STORAGE is a mouthful, and looks redundant. But in doubt, the client/user could use static imports, turning this into KTX_TEXTURE_CREATE_NO_STORAGE (i.e. the exact same thing as in native code). Compared to the previous one, KtxTextureCreateStorage.NO, this seems reasonable. (This one would turn into NO with a static import - good luck doing a full-text search for that...).

I also started adding the documentation from the native side to these constant definitions and some of the related methods (i.e. the ones for using and setting them). These might be useful on a certain level - before and after:

[javagl]

The last passes contained a few steps of that dull, repetitive, boring, repetitive, tedius, and repetitive handling of JavaDoc, based on the documentation from the native side.

And apparently, the JavaDocs have never been used or created before. Most of the (few) existing ones had been invalid. Now they are fixed.

I have added the creation of the JavaDoc to the POM. The current state is attached here:

libktx-4.0.0-SNAPSHOT-javadoc.zip

There are a few degrees of freedom for reducing (or handling) the redundancy of JavaDoc comments for cases like the ...Param classes, which correspond to the native ...Param structs, but introduce setters/getters for each field. The current approach is what I consider to be a reasonable middle-ground:

• The field itself receives a very short comment (roughly: The first sentence from the native documentation)
• The getter receives a similarly short comment, but links to the setter (with See [link])
• The return value of the getter and the parameter of the setter receive a very short description (sometimes even resorting to "The setting" or "The value", just to keep things manageable...)
• The actual documentation is put into the setter

The rationale here is that

• users don't see the field itself, which is private
• users who see the getter have the direct link to the setter
• the setter is where the actual information is most relevant - mainly, the valid ranges, constraints, and the effect of the setting.

Here's an example for the uastcRDOMaxSmoothBlockErrorScale:

(Yeah, .. who's ever gonna change that anyhow? But I see complete JavaDoc as some sort of minimal baseline, to be at least on par with the native docs, even if the docs might have to be extended to be really useful for end-users...)

[javagl]

About the current build failures:

What's surprising is that I also don't see these errors locally, and they don't happen in the Windows build. Iff I understood that correctly, very roughly: Windows builds are done by GitHub actions. Linux/MacOs are done by Travis - and the error only appears in https://app.travis-ci.com/github/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/jobs/620089455#L866 but not in https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/actions/runs/8543283946/job/23406762987#step:14:48

I'll probably have to add some quirky printf-logging in the JNI layer to even be able to guess why CreateFromMemory might fail on Linux/MacOS...

[MarkCallow]

About the current build failures:

What's surprising is that I also don't see these errors locally, and they don't happen in the Windows build. Iff I understood that correctly, very roughly: Windows builds are done by GitHub actions. Linux/MacOs are done by Travis - and the error only appears in https://app.travis-ci.com/github/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/jobs/620089455#L866 but not in https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/actions/runs/8543283946/job/23406762987#step:14:48

I'll probably have to add some quirky printf-logging in the JNI layer to even be able to guess why CreateFromMemory might fail on Linux/MacOS...

Don't obsess about Travis vs. Actions. Both macOS and Linux builds are failing. These builds are run on different machines, even though both under Travis. Look instead at the environments on the runners, particularly the Java/JVM versions in use.

[MarkCallow]

About the current build failures:

There are 2 circumstances in which KTX_INVALID_OPERATION can be returned during ktxTexture2_CreateFromMemory:

1. If the offset of the supercompression global data or of the first mip level is greater than the byte length specified to ktxTexture2_CreateFromMemory. This comes from ktxMemStream_setpos.
2. If you are trying to load the data and it has already been loaded. For example calling ktxTexture2_LoadImageData after calling ktxTexture2_CreateFromMemory with KTX_TEXTURE_CREATE_LOAD_IMAGE_DATA_BIT set. This comes from ktxTexture2_LoadImageData.

Not clear why either of these would be triggered on Linux and macOS but not Windows.

[javagl]

Thanks for the details @MarkCallow .

I added some printf-debug-log output (in the hope that it would show up in the build logs), but during that, noticed an embarrassing error in the JNI function for acquiring the input data for CreateFromMemory: A sign error for the computation of the size of the data caused a value like -1000 to be interpreted as a size_t, so the function was called with something like size=1844674407370955061 (~ uint64 max value).

This is fixed now. Let's see whether the build passes.

Two points remain open:

• Why didn't this cause an error on Windows? (It looks like Windows is ignoring the size parameter in some way?)
• It is related to the question that I already brought up in the (updated) bullet point list of the first post here a while ago:
  • TODO: ... We may have to think about how to handle the absence of unsigned in Java in some cases...

The latter is a more general question. Unsigned types are error-prone, particularly in interfaces - see e.g. https://www.aristeia.com/Papers/C++ReportColumns/sep95.pdf , which points out exactly what happened here. And when crossing the language barrier between Java and C++, one has to be particularly careful about that...

[javagl]

@MarkCallow We'll have to think about a sensible strategy for reviewing and merging this.

Looking at the changes will hardly make sense. Nearly every file of the JNI bindings was modified. I tried to update the bullet point list in the first post with the progress. Beyond that, I can probably try to give a short summary here, with an overview of the most important changes/commits:

• Added JavaDocs. This has been spread over many commits, only one example: https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/pull/886/commits/2810d2b8012ae205fe0b3dee32249bff1f648e6b
• Update the KtxTestLibraryLoader to work on Windows, via https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/pull/886/commits/bf0c644f0e608d62fe8a18cfe4df04d2ac660e8d
• [Breaking]: I updated all constants to match the name that they have in the native layer. For example, https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/pull/886/commits/c3c860072d509b1ea4cecac6a68b3d238d1a295d#diff-7e22517bac1468d9f5cff73b4d8e6ecdb2cc11608424890e8f2ac6d9bb06fa19
• Added stringFor-functions that take the respective enum constants, and return their string representation (e.g. https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/pull/886/commits/332510f2b98cc031c7f40b926dc1ba6b56d8c914 ). Note that this only returns the string representation, and not the elaborate description that some of the functions in the native layer return
• [Build process]: Added the step to generate the JavaDocs to the Maven pom.xml at https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/pull/886/commits/b74784930da12f73876e1597ef73d8808480c619
• The field- and method IDs that are used for accessing the Java structures from the JNI layer are now initialized once, when the library is loaded (via https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/pull/886/commits/2c86122cac0807231aa5504031225edbf2b7b46f )
• One of the most important points: Error handling:
  • Passing in null to any function will not cause a JVM crash any more, but throw a NullPointerException instead (e.g. https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/pull/886/commits/8f581095765168a194bac0ebc403d942b6a1a486 )
  • When an OutOfMemoryError is caused in the native layer, then the functions return immediately (and throw this pending error), e.g. https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/pull/886/commits/a5adb8abad12e89f20ebe0436d200663e51da125
  • When trying to use a texture on which destroy was already called, then this will not cause a JVM crash, but throw an IllegalStateException instead (mainly done in https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/pull/886/commits/3673c0aa8c043aabbff2bfe759d22d9b9929bdce )

Some of this is just "baseline stuff" to follow the recommendations from https://developer.ibm.com/articles/j-jni/ . But some points still have subjective elements to them.

---

I have actively been using the resulting library in a small dummy application where you can drag-and-drop a PNG file, see a preview of the PNG and its KTX version, drag around some sliders for the compression/quality (and see a live preview). So I'm confident that this "mostly works". But there are still a few things to wrap up.

• Some of the JNI implementations still have to be reviewed to ensure that they don't perform operations with pending exceptions, and maybe run with -verbose:jni to spot further possible pitfalls that already existed in the code
• There should be a version of setImageFromMemory that does not accept a byte[] array, but a ByteBuffer as the last parameter (mentioned in https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/pull/886#issuecomment-2020869640 )
• The open points of the bullet point list from the first post

But maybe this can already go through a first review pass, based on the current state.

[MarkCallow]

How do we make further progress on this?

I find having the full KTX_ prefixes rather clunky. Can't we follow the WebGL model which removed all the GL_ prefixes?

[javagl]

That's the question: What could be a sensible way to review this, given that it is ... nearly a "rewrite" of the JNI bindings?

Is the bullet point list above sufficient? Should I invite further potential reviewers? I'm pretty flexible here. If you wish, we could also arrange a short call to go through the changes, what's left to do, and what could be the next steps.

I find having the full KTX_ prefixes rather clunky. Can't we follow the WebGL model which removed all the GL_ prefixes?

From quickly skimming over some Python binding files, it looks like the Python bindings are also just omitting the KTX_, so the question is then: Should the naming be consistent with the C-layer or should it be consistent with the bindings? I think that changing KtxTextureCreateStorage.KTX_TEXTURE_CREATE_NO_STORAGE to KtxTextureCreateStorage.TEXTURE_CREATE_NO_STORAGE does not make a crucial difference here, but when you say that the KTX_ prefixes should be omitted, I'll remove them.

[MarkCallow]

@javagl, PR #874 extends the Javascript binding to provide full libktx functionality. As part of it I went over the naming. I made the names consistent with the libktx names and I ended up removing all the ktx and KTX_ prefixes. This is because the module that contains the binding is typically called ktx. Please take a look. Perhaps it can inform the naming here too. If we change any names that exist in the current binding we should provide the old names as aliases.

I suggest asking @ShukantPal to review this as he is the author of the original binding.

The bullet point list at the top is a good guide. Obviously there are items to be completed. I think a short call would be good but I want to first familiarize myself with the code. I'll let you know when I've done that and we can then plan the call.

[javagl]

Thanks @MarkCallow , I'll try to allocate some time looking over the changes from the linked PR. This PR should be a step in the direction of aligning the JNI bindings with KTX itself. We can decide later whether some missing parts (like bindings for the ktxHash... family of functions) will become part of this PR or a dedicated, new one.

Perhaps it can inform the naming here too. If we change any names that exist in the current binding we should provide the old names as aliases.

I'm in favor of aligning names insofar that they should be recognizable as their native counterpart. There are some conventions in the respective target languages, though. For example, I wouldn't use something else than a UPPER_SNAKE_CASE for constant names or something else than CamelCase for class names in Java, but the details can still be sorted out. (E.g. the removal of the KTX_ prefix mentioned above)

[MarkCallow]

@javagl, I've been reviewing the discussion here and some of the code including the commits you specifically called out in comment of April 18th. The code I've seen looks very good.

I added a note to the description suggesting following the JS binding handling of metadata queries.

Added stringFor-functions that take the respective enum constants, and return their string representation (e.g. https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/commit/332510f2b98cc031c7f40b926dc1ba6b56d8c914 ). Note that this only returns the string representation, and not the elaborate description that some of the functions in the native layer return

Can't you call the native function(s) from the stringFor function to get the elaborate description. I'd particularly like to have the full descriptions of the error codes. Are there any beyond ktx_error_code_e where the native side has a convert-to-string function?

I am happy you have replaced the crashes with exceptions.

I have actively been using the resulting library in a small dummy application where you can drag-and-drop a PNG file, see a preview of the PNG and its KTX version, drag around some sliders for the compression/quality (and see a live preview). So I'm confident that this "mostly works". But there are still a few things to wrap up.

Any plan to release this? Does the preview show you both pre- and post-compression images so you can easily compare them?

Some of the JNI implementations still have to be reviewed to ensure that they don't perform operations with pending exceptions, and maybe run with -verbose:jni to spot further possible pitfalls that already existed in the code

Which implementations?

There should be a version of setImageFromMemory that does not accept a byte[] array, but a ByteBuffer as the last parameter (mentioned in https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/pull/886#issuecomment-2020869640)

I agree a version that accepts ByteBuffer is needed.

The open points of the bullet point list from the first post

Yes.

But maybe this can already go through a first review pass, based on the current state.

There is certainly enough here to review. I want to spent a little more time familiarizing myself with the code before we arrange that call.

Note that all GitHub Actions Windows builds are currently broken due a bad GHA runner image. Many tests, including the Java binding tests fail with segmentation violations.

[javagl]

Thanks for the detailed review.

---

I added a note to the https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/pull/886#issue-2208337582 suggesting following the JS binding handling of metadata queries.

I haven't looked at the detals of the hash-related functions. If it's "only" about exposing 3 functions, then it might be added here, to be on par with other bindings, but if it's too much, it might make more sense to carve it out into a follow-up PR.

---

Can't you call the native function(s) from the stringFor function to get the elaborate description. I'd particularly like to have the full descriptions of the error codes. Are there any beyond ktx_error_code_e where the native side has a convert-to-string function?

There are two levels here:

1. A function of obtaining a string version of the constant itself
2. A function for the actual description of the meaning of the constant

Until now, I only addressed 1.: Each "enum" has a stringFor function. This is particularly useful for the KtxErrorCode, where you could have System.out.println("Error " + errorCode); // Prints '16' - what is that? vs System.out.println("Error " + KtxErrorCode.stringFor(errorCode)); // Prints 'UNSUPPORTED_TEXTURE_TYPE' But similarly applies to all other "enum" types.

Now, I saw that there is the ktxErrorString function in the native layer. (And I think that this the only function of this kind in the native layer, but will have to check again to be sure). And one could make a case for exposing that via JNI, to be able to do something like System.out.println("Error " + KtxErrorCode.errorString(errorCode)); // Prints "Texture type not supported." I think that this does not add soooo much value beyond UNSUPPORTED_TEXTURE_TYPE, but can add this, if desired.

---

I have actively been using the resulting library in a small dummy application

Any plan to release this? Does the preview show you both pre- and post-compression images so you can easily compare them?

Until now, this was mainly for internal experiments and testing. I think that it might eventually have some aspects that are "useful", and that it could be worth being published. We'll probably have to sort out some of the "Maven Release"-related questions before this can be done, but maybe there can be an "early sneak preview" release.

The goal was to have some sort of "interactive preview". (As 'interactive' as it can be, when encoding an image takes 5 seconds...). I did create a short screengrab of that a while ago (yeah... as a GIF... but), maybe it shows the overall idea:

---

Some of the JNI implementations still have to be reviewed to ensure that they don't perform operations with pending exceptions, and maybe run with -verbose:jni to spot further possible pitfalls that already existed in the code Which implementations?

I did try to keep an eye on that for every function that I "touched", but did not systematically go through all function from top to bottom. It boils down to the following pattern:

When any JNI function that is called with env->... causes an exception, then it is not allowed to call any other JNI function. Instead, the function must return immediately (and leave the handling of the pending exception to the Java layer).

(The only functions that may be called with a pending exception are the ones like env->ExceptionCheck() or certain env->Release... functions. Details in the specification).

To check this manually, I'd have to read every function and see whether it exposes this pattern (calling a function when an exception might be pending). It can be automated to some extent, with the ‑Xcheck:jni verbose, but this only covers the case where such an exception actually appears....

---

I still have to look closer at the other PR, but will try to at least pick up the work here (syncing with master, addressing some of the smaller points mentioned above...) in the next days.

[MarkCallow]

There is certainly enough here to review. I want to spent a little more time familiarizing myself with the code before we arrange that call.

I am now back to familiarizing myself with the more of this code. Sorry for the looooong delay. Can we arrange a call towards the end of next week, FaceTime or Skype? I want to get this wrapped up.

Regarding constant naming. both the JS and Python bindings remove KTX_ and all other parts of a name that are reflected in the class or enum name. (The sole slight exception I've spotted is e.g. KTX_PACK_ASTC_BLOCK_DIMENSION_4x4, where dimension is in the enum name (JS) or class name (Python) but due to the numerical tail an alphabetic character is needed. Python is using D4x4. JS is using d4x4. I will change the latter since it is not yet released. I wonder though if it should be D_4x4 or DIMENSION_4x4.) Java should follow the same model for constants.

Another aspect of naming is the enum or class name. In the JS binding I have used the enum or struct name from the C API minus the ktx or KTX_ prefix. enums are therefore lower_snake_case and structs, classes in JS, are CamelCase. Python has used KtxCamelCase for everything. We need to discuss and regularize how to treat these names.

Please merge the latest main into this branch.

You will almost certainly get a failure in the first Travis-CI job of a build which is a Mac build. This is due to now using vcpkg for dependencies for the load test apps. The dependencies will not be cached in the initial build. The resulting extended log length from building them seems to be hitting a Travis-CI limit.

[javagl]

I have updated with the main state, and added a few exception checks that had been pointed out by running it with Xcheck:jni.

---

For the constants: I'm OK with either pattern.

• the full name KTX_<whatever>_<value> or
• omitting KTX, as in <whatever>_<value>, or
• the short one, just <value>

As long as it is consistent, I don't have a strong opinion. It can either be aligned with the C name (i.e. the long form), or the short name that is used in other bindings.

Java does not differentiate between "struct" and "class". Java does have enum, but this is currently not used. From the perspective of the user, the difference between a class (with public static final int CONSTANTS = ...) and an enum is negligible. For the names of classes, there is a strong convention to use CamelCase, and we should not deviate from that.

---

Can we arrange a call towards the end of next week, FaceTime or Skype? I want to get this wrapped up.

If you don't mind, I'll send you a mail to arrange the details.

[MarkCallow]

If you don't mind, I'll send you a mail to arrange the details.

Certainly. I did not intend to arrange that through this public forum.

[javagl]

The ktxErrorString function that was mentioned in an earlier comment ( https://github.com/KhronosGroup/KTX-Software/pull/886#issuecomment-2160458217 ) should also be part of the Java API. It should be simple to add, and can become part of this PR as well.

[javagl]

The last sequence of commits are...

• "Update ... names" commits: These are changing the names of constants, to omit any redundant prefixes. For example, KtxPackAstcBlockDimension.KTX_PACK_ASTC_BLOCK_DIMENSION_D4x4 is now just called KtxPackAstcBlockDimension.D4x4, which is aligned with the naming in the JavaScript- and Python bindings
• Added a binding for ktxErrorString. It's a judgement call where and how to add this. In the native layer, it's a "free-floating" function that does not belong anywhere. On the Java side, I thought that it would make sense to offer it as KtxErrorCode.createString(int).
• A minor fix for ktxErrorString on the native side

The last one appears to be related to the (open) question about how to handle the absence of unsigned types in Java. But strictly speaking, it isn't: Even in the native layer, something like const char* s = ktxErrorString(-1234); would have caused ... Undefined Behavior, I guess.

Visual Studio even points this out:

So I changed that check to

    if (error < 0 || error > KTX_ERROR_MAX_ENUM)
        return "Unrecognized error code";
    ...

[javagl]

I think that the build failure should already have been sorted out - right now, it marks some actions as 'failed' because they have been cancelled (maybe because I edited the first post while the build was running?).

In doubt, I could push ... "some change" ... to trigger a re-run (because I apparently cannot request a re-run manually).

Apart from that, this PR should be 'Ready for review' (which might be short, because intermediate states have already been reviewed and discussed).

Miscellaneous:

• At some point, the change log may have to include a hint that the Java bindings have been ~"incompatibly refactored". I think this is not a big deal, because there probably haven't been so many people been using the previous state (and those who did hopefully appreciate the changes, even though some of them may be "breaking" in the strictest sense)
• The open points from the first comment of this PR (Maven release, formatting, ....) will be promoted into dedicated issues where appropriate

[MarkCallow]

In GitHub Actions when a job in a workflow fails the remaining jobs are cancelled. The VS2019 job in the Windows workflow is failing. I just tried re-running this job but it still fails in the same place: problems creating the Javadoc. I will try rerunning the cancelled jobs. Some of the Linux build jobs are failing for a similar reason. I did not try to re-run them. I'm don't know yet why some macOS jobs are failing.

When you add more commits to a PR, existing queued builds are cancelled, running builds may be cancelled. A new build is started for the new commit when an existing job is cancelled or finishes. All this means in this case that the errors remain in the code of the most recent commit because a build was done using it.

[MarkCallow]

The failures in the Emscripten jobs look to be due to an updated clang in the latest Emscripten Docker image. Research is needed.

[MarkCallow]

The failures in the Emscripten jobs look to be due to an updated clang

Yup. It appears clang 20 now warns about ~~conflicting~~duelling floating point options and we build with -Werror so the warning stops the build. The ~~conflicting~~duelling options are in the ASTC encoder build. Don't you worry about this @javagl, I'll deal with it.