sttm-web
sttm-web copied to clipboard
Support Google AMP
This is good for SEO and let's user see content much faster.
Blocked by adding SSR support.
@ManjotS Do you know if this is doable? Not sure what the blocker is but wanting to know whether it can be worked on or still blocked.
I don't know what SSR is. Somebody with working knowledge of this will need to respond. @bogas04 @navdeepsingh @tsingh777
SSR is server-side-rendering
we have server side rendering according to the last conversation I saw on slack.
Is it blocked by having it or not having it?
We have SSR for purpose of rendering the initial HTML chunk, not the actual content. That is where frameworks like NextJS come into place, however for our scenario it's better we add webpack+babel tooling for our server to be able to render react components.
I think @plug-n-play is working on nextjs
Yes @ManjotS - Helping hand(s) would be great. @bogas04 and I have been advocating this since long. Would really appreciate if we can give this a serious shot and move forward. This would help help sttm.co a lot.
Related to #329
@plug-n-play what's the status of Nextjs transformation at your side?
I m no longer working on it
@gurjit03 please look into this and feedback.