Vincent Prouillet
Vincent Prouillet
That looks much better than my half-baked Pest parser (although I still prefer pest to combine but that's not important)! It would be really neat for the Rust ecosystem to...
Is there anything blocking that?
@ChrisBuchholz Look at https://github.com/Keats/validator the `validator_derive` crate does exactly that
Looking at the README and issues, it seems that the plan (regarding structs only) is to build something very similar to `validator` with the main (only?) difference being the error...
Just wanted to avoid duplication of work if the goals coincided but they don't: i18n support is an explicit non-goal for me. Regarding the nightly, custom derive will be stable...
> Is that change expected? Yes: https://github.com/serde-rs/json/pull/919 That has broken some unit tests of mine as well as some different output :/ Not a huge deal but it was probably...
The `public` directory is meant to be generated and published so it shouldn't contain things like git folders in the first place?
Wouldn't the .git files be exposed by the webserver then?
If it's an opt-in option then it's fine to add
You can already make a table of content without that: https://github.com/getzola/book In practice what you're asking is not going to happen though, sections are not pages