Kashish k
Kashish k
@pallavidhere23 Yes sure, go ahead. Consider creating PR in `develop` branch.
@palrohitg assigning it to you. Submit the corresponding PR by tomorrow EOD.
So, this happens for users who use *python2.x* and *python3.x* without a virtual environment setup. It would still be preferable to remove all the `*.pyc` files generated during/after execution. @palrohitg...
@palrohitg , checking for status of work here?
> @Kashish121 What I'm thinking for this issue is that instead of deleting those generated `*.pyc files` we should prevent their generation in the first place. Please expand on this.
> We can set `dont_write_bytecode` of `sys` module`to`True`. I can create a PR for the same. Sure! go ahead. 👍🏽
Sure @tanay13 , please go ahead with it. 👍
@nihalbaig0 work on it then. :)
Hey @pallavidhere23 @ShivanshSri-droid , it seems this issue was already resolved (look #91). You guys can try and work on any other issue [here](https://github.com/vinitshahdeo/PortScanner/issues) or wait for new issues which...
@deprov447 sure you can. The Port Scanning feature take 3 inputs as can be seen in the UI - *Host to scan, Low Range, High Range*. The history column can...