Kagami

I'll look into this, thanks. Though I don't think this will give big speedup compared to asm.js since it's just another format for the same thing. The really promising feature...

There is no real difference between compiling to asm.js or compiling to wasm. Most important advantage is load time, in terms of speed Firefox uses AOT compilation for asm.js anyway,...

Thanks for your research @tpetry. I agree, it's definitely worth to add support for WebAssembly.

@Samlv9 added to normal builds.

It's not available yet. In the meantime you can rebuild with the features you need, see instruction in readme.

Please see #104

I've created the home page at https://github.com/Kagami/ffmpeg.js/wiki Anyone interested to help could add some howtos and info for beginners.

It was re-enabled in Chrome and Edge, but still disabled in Firefox and Safari. Not sure if I want to enable it now. Maybe will experiment later.

Didn't know about that. My concern is based on https://wiki.xiph.org/OpusFAQ#Will_Opus_replace_Vorbis_in_video_files.3F >For WebM video files, the convention is to use the VP9 video codec when using Opus as an audio codec....

> Why not make a standard ffmpeg build with everything included for easier development Yes, I have issue for that: #26. >as everything will work when you are just testing...