Jean-Yves Moyen
Jean-Yves Moyen
Should be done in https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules-web
> And the visible definition will also have to be edited, because it links to the examples. It should link to the new "rule" instead. Yes. Not sure what URL...
Call for review has ended. Merging.
Yes, I think the `generic` role needs to be skipped over by the rule, this matches its definition. In Alfa, we map DOM nodes to either `Element` or `Container` accessibility...
Validity on the type was removed in #1583. Discussed in #1562. The rule has a Background note: > Many browsers provide auto-filling suggestions even when the control's type [attribute value](https://act-rules.github.io/rules/73f2c2#attribute-value)...
> Until 4.1.1 Parsing goes away in 2.2, I think this would fail that, would it not? Once we get to 2.2, this rules could just be removed, but until...
> > To be clear, I'm not arguing that a tool shouldn't be allowed to ignore this scenario > > Same here; could be great having this clarified somewhere in...
> Suppose something like this is failing/buggy in one AT but not another. What then? Then, we fill in an [Accessibility Support note](https://www.w3.org/TR/act-rules-format/#accessibility-support) which is precisely here to document these...
Yep, this has been a problem for some time, see #1971.
Decision: * restrict the rule to HTML tables, possibly continuing on #1971. * @WilcoFiers to reach out to ARIA group to ask how ARIA tables are supposed to work and...