Justin Cappos
Justin Cappos
> [@brandtkeller](https://github.com/brandtkeller) [@mnm678](https://github.com/mnm678) [@guilhermocc](https://github.com/guilhermocc) all expressed interest in being a reviewer. Can you each please read the guidelines and assert if you have any hard or soft conflicts? @brandtkeller @mnm678...
Okay, thanks! @mrcdb we're ready to go with the naïve questions phase!
@camilaavilarinho @matthewflannery Okay, added you both!
> Even so, a single level of intermediate delegations (`vendor`) could still result in some fairly large downloads, but at a relatively low frequency. Right. Most vendors wouldn't have this....
Context from the NYU side: I can check about getting a place at NYU. The auditorium I know we may be able to book has around 200 seats. There is...
And I'd like to further commend you on the issue. Specification clarifications are definitely something we care about. We will be working to address your concerns.
If this happens, we could also put info about completed assessments in there as a way of raising visibility.
Do they want a joint assessment done or just to have this merged? I looked and it seems they addressed my comments. It has a ways to go before being...
A few issues with the checks + being out of date with the base branch. Seems fine to merge after.
@gaius-qi Okay, can you edit the info above to mention who from the dragonfly side will be the "Project Security Lead"? Please also link to the self assessment as the...