Luj
Will this not create more friction to contribution to non-critical infra, if changes can potentially have impacts on core-infra and as such have to be reviewed more strictly?
I'd like to self-nominate to be a shepherd.
If there is a need for more shepherds, I'd like to self nominate for that. I've been following this RFC carefully, worked with bootspec v1 implementation in the `systemd-boot` backend...
@RaitoBezarius @GovanifY @06kellyjac @hesiod @lheckemann let's set up a first sync call either the week of the 14th of the week of the 21st. Can you please fill [this when2meet](https://www.when2meet.com/?22974581-3SlPH)...
@06kellyjac @hesiod I invited you both to a matrix room so that we can synchronously converge towards dates for our meeting, could you join please ?
On February 22nd we had a RFC meeting. Participants: @RaitoBezarius and myself. Overall, we agreed that there do not seem to be anything controversial preventing this RFC to go ahead....
> I see two shepherds. > > > > - @RaitoBezarius > > - @Janik-Haag > > > > Looking for 1 more. I am willing to be a shepherd
I have the same problem
Yes, it *should* be. However nix has a cache of substituters priorities that has I think one week of TTL. Your option is that case is to go and directly...
Hello, Why are we not considering a self-hosted, NixOS enabled solution like listmonk ?