Backports for 1.10.10

[KristofferC]

Backported PRs:

• [x] #56413
• [x] #56938
• [x] #56984
• [x] #57386
• [x] #57539
• [x] #57608
• [x] #57476
• [x] #57725
• [x] #57790
• [x] #57801
• [x] #57781
• [x] #57853
• [x] #57863
• [x] #57862
• [x] #56924
• [x] #57913
• [x] #57915
• [x] #57950
• [x] #49669
• [x] #58086
• [x] #56673
• [x] #58159
• [x] #58200
• [x] #58196
• [x] #58113
• [x] #58322
• [x] #58607
• [x] #54582
• [x] #55405
• [x] #57080
• [x] #57395
• [x] #58011
• [x] #58127
• [x] #58157
• [x] #58209
• [x] #58356
• [x] #58410
• [x] #58510
• [x] #58584
• [x] #53967
• [x] #54548
• [x] #57591
• [x] #57129
• [x] #58258
• [x] #58512
• [x] #58110

Need manual backport:

• [ ] #52119
• [ ] #55744
• [ ] #57131
• [ ] #57722

Contains multiple commits, manual intervention needed:

• [ ] #54738
• [ ] #55348
• [ ] #55306
• [ ] #55729
• [ ] #55877
• [ ] #56755
• [ ] #56999
• [ ] #57584
• [ ] #57809
• [ ] #57398
• [ ] #57858
• [ ] #58435
• [ ] #58012

Non-merged PRs with backport label:

• [ ] #58535
• [ ] #57604
• [ ] #56890
• [ ] #55958
• [ ] #55956
• [ ] #55534
• [ ] #55499
• [ ] #55311
• [ ] #55220
• [ ] #51479
• [ ] #50813
• [ ] #50157

[DilumAluthge]

Hmmm. Was it intentional that this PR was closed?

[IanButterworth]

Ugh.. sorry, the github desktop app has a bug where it deletes upstream branches rather than the origin branch when you instruct it to do that.

[KristofferC]

@mbauman, I reverted https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/58012 due to

  LoadError: return type Tuple{Vector{REPL.REPLCompletions.Completion}, UnitRange{Int64}, Bool} does not match inferred return type Tuple{Union{Bool, Vector{REPL.REPLCompletions.Completion}}, UnitRange{Int64}, Bool}

feel free to push a fixed version.

[KristofferC]

@nanosoldier runtests()

[KristofferC]

I've seen

strings/basic                                    (17) |         failed at 2025-06-05T14:55:12.154
Test Failed at /cache/build/tester-amdci4-13/julialang/julia-release-1-dot-10/julia-96dc2d8c45/share/julia/test/strings/basic.jl:877
  Expression: all((==)(Int64), Base.return_types(prevind, Tuple{AbstractString, Vararg}))
Test Failed at /cache/build/tester-amdci4-13/julialang/julia-release-1-dot-10/julia-96dc2d8c45/share/julia/test/strings/basic.jl:878
  Expression: all((==)(Int64), Base.return_types(nextind, Tuple{AbstractString, Vararg}))

on different workers, I think it has to do with what tests ran before.

[nanosoldier]

The package evaluation job you requested has completed - possible new issues were detected. The full report is available.

Report summary

❗ Packages that crashed

1 packages crashed only on the current version.

• The process was aborted: 1 packages

178 packages crashed on the previous version too.

✖ Packages that failed

36 packages failed only on the current version.

• Package has test failures: 2 packages
• Package tests unexpectedly errored: 6 packages
• Tests became inactive: 2 packages
• Test duration exceeded the time limit: 26 packages

2541 packages failed on the previous version too.

✔ Packages that passed tests

32 packages passed tests only on the current version.

• Other: 32 packages

6576 packages passed tests on the previous version too.

➖ Packages that were skipped altogether

1126 packages were skipped on the previous version too.

[KristofferC]

@nanosoldier runtests(["Logging2", "DarkCurves", "Curve25519", "BenchmarkTools", "Optimisers", "UCX", "Diffractor", "Evolutionary", "Distributions", "PoincareInvariants", "OptimizationPRIMA", "FiniteMPS", "QuantumOpticsBase", "CompressiveLearning", "DiscreteChoiceModels", "LongwaveModePropagator", "CellularPotts", "HighVoronoi", "ControlBarrierFunctions", "QuanEstimation", "CDGRNs", "SwissVAMyKnife", "Test", "Agate", "MagNav"])

[nanosoldier]

The package evaluation job you requested has completed - possible new issues were detected. The full report is available.

Report summary

✖ Packages that failed

7 packages failed only on the current version.

• Package has test failures: 1 packages
• Package tests unexpectedly errored: 4 packages
• Test duration exceeded the time limit: 2 packages

✔ Packages that passed tests

18 packages passed tests on the previous version too.

[KristofferC]

@nanosoldier runbenchmarks(ALL, vs=":release-1.10")

[nanosoldier]

Your benchmark job has completed - possible performance regressions were detected. A full report can be found here.