Tables.jl
Tables.jl copied to clipboard
Add `nrow` and `ncol`
I noticed that there is a rowcount
, but not a columncount
and that length(columnnames(cols))
was used in the codebase to count the number of columns (because that is the fastest?). This PR suggests to add a columncount
function.
The DataAPI.jl defines nrow
and ncol
as a public API for this. rowcount
is internal. If we are at it it would be probably better to properly implement default nrow
and ncol
implementations in this PR.
If we are at it it would be probably better to properly implement default
nrow
andncol
implementations in this PR.
That would be great yes. Then Tables.jl
sources can provide more efficient methods.
rowcount
is internal.
How can I make nrow
and ncol
public for Tables.jl
? I'm not sure what the convention is here
How can I make
nrow
andncol
public for Tables.jl? I'm not sure what the convention is here
You do not need to do anything more than you did. Tables.jl does not export anything, but nrow
and ncol
are public because they implement public interface defined in DataAPI.jl.
Codecov Report
Merging #285 (f094263) into main (60c080c) will decrease coverage by
0.55%
. The diff coverage is50.00%
.
:exclamation: Current head f094263 differs from pull request most recent head acc8ac8. Consider uploading reports for the commit acc8ac8 to get more accurate results
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #285 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 94.88% 94.32% -0.56%
==========================================
Files 7 7
Lines 665 670 +5
==========================================
+ Hits 631 632 +1
- Misses 34 38 +4
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/dicts.jl | 92.66% <0.00%> (-1.74%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/fallbacks.jl | 97.90% <0.00%> (-0.69%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/namedtuples.jl | 98.66% <0.00%> (-1.34%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/Tables.jl | 88.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
src/matrix.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 60c080c...acc8ac8. Read the comment docs.
@bkamins @quinnj Is 5722256 going in the expected direction? Probably needs some more tests and I probably should implement a few more methods?
@quinnj will know best if you correctly covered everything :), but for matrices things look good :).