DataTables.jl icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
DataTables.jl copied to clipboard

Recommended date to make DataTables branches master

Open mkborregaard opened this issue 8 years ago • 4 comments

When is the recommended date to make DataTables branches of packages that depend on DataFrames the main branch (i.e. the one that goes into METADATA)?

mkborregaard avatar Feb 27 '17 07:02 mkborregaard

I don't think it's very clear now. Ideally most packages would just depend on AbstractTables and work with both DataFrames and DataTables, but we need to create that interface first. The port of StatsModels is going to be a good test for that.

nalimilan avatar Feb 27 '17 09:02 nalimilan

Sounds good, is there somewhere to keep up-to-date with this? It would be supercool to have one place for package owners to stay updated about the transition and preferred approach.

mkborregaard avatar Feb 27 '17 09:02 mkborregaard

I guess once we have a plan we will post it to the Discourse thread. https://github.com/JuliaStats/DataFrames.jl/issues/1092 should also reflect the progress.

If you want to follow the ongoing work, have a look at issues and PRs in StatsModels.

nalimilan avatar Feb 27 '17 09:02 nalimilan

OK I follow the discourse thread and https://github.com/JuliaStats/DataFrames.jl/issues/1092 but hadn't heard about AbstractTables. That sounds great, but also makes me change some updates I had already done, hence my request for a location to follow. Right, thanks for the pointers.

mkborregaard avatar Feb 27 '17 09:02 mkborregaard